Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:24:45PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> > Hmm, from the version numbers (2.2.3a-6 to 2.2.3a-12) and changelog
> > entries since the version in stable it looks as if this upgrade does a
> > little more than just fix the se
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:24:45PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> > Hmm, from the version numbers (2.2.3a-6 to 2.2.3a-12) and changelog
> > entries since the version in stable it looks as if this upgrade does a
> > little more than just fix the se
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:24:45PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hmm, from the version numbers (2.2.3a-6 to 2.2.3a-12) and changelog
> entries since the version in stable it looks as if this upgrade does a
> little more than just fix the security problem. Whatever happened to
> just backport
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 08:24:45PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hmm, from the version numbers (2.2.3a-6 to 2.2.3a-12) and changelog
> entries since the version in stable it looks as if this upgrade does a
> little more than just fix the security problem. Whatever happened to
> just backport
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 23 November 2002 05:21, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Package : samba
> Problem type : remote exploit
> Debian-specific: no
>
> Steve Langasek found an exploitable bug in the password handling
> code in samba: when converting from DOS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 23 November 2002 05:21, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Package : samba
> Problem type : remote exploit
> Debian-specific: no
>
> Steve Langasek found an exploitable bug in the password handling
> code in samba: when converting from DOS
6 matches
Mail list logo
