On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:18:04 +0100
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2010-12-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> > will new advisories be in a machine parseable format?
> [...]
>
> We're open for input here. Everyone is invited to send a list of needed
> features to t...@security.debian.org.
FWIW, D
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:47:47 -0800 Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> will it include a list of affected binary packages (in addition to source
> packages)?
Just as a point of reference, you can use the debsecan package (or
the security-tracker site [0]) right now to determine whether various
package ver
On 2010-12-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums
>> of the updated packages. This was introduced at a time when apt didn't
>> exist yet and BIND was at version 4.
>
Hi,
On Sat Dec 18, 2010 at 16:47:47 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums
> > of the updated packages. This was introduced at a time when apt didn't
> > exist
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums
> of the updated packages. This was introduced at a time when apt didn't
> exist yet and BIND was at version 4.
>
> Since apt cryptographically enforces the i
5 matches
Mail list logo
