On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 12:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> > > These files haven't been built on a build daemon, but instead have
> > > been uploaded by the maintainer [1]. This is therefore not a buildd
> > > issue, the issue has been fixed there already with the upgrade to
> > > stretch.
>
On 2017-08-28 12:42, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 12:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On 2017-08-28 12:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, C
On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > > > a) Has anything changed i
On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > > a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
> > >
> > > Yes: sbuild stopped r
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:48:18PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The above change should now be deployed on most jessie based buildds,
> it's only missing on the buildds that are currently down.
cool, thank you!
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
> >
> > Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking it from the last
> > entry, and wi
On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
>
> Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking it from the last
> entry, and will instead generate a new timestamp based on the curren
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 05:52:04PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
>
> Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking it from the last
> entry, and will instead generate a new timestam
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking it from the last
entry, and will instead generate a new timestamp based on the current
time:
* For binNMUs, instead of copying the time
Hi all,
Just following up on this thread. As it's been a while, here's the
thread index:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/01/threads.html#00014
... but AIUI, the issue is as follows. Naturally, let me know if this
a poor or inaccurate summary:
* binNMUs do not bump debian/changel
Hi,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2017-01-30 14:58:33)
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > b.) if thats the case, shall we scan all packages in sid for files which
> > > have the same timestamp+filename but different checksums and ask for
> > > binNMUs of those packa
12 matches
Mail list logo
