On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 16:22, Csillag Kristóf wrote:
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
ONLY, really ONLY if the MTA receives the mail per sendmail. I woul
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 16:22, Csillag Kristóf wrote:
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
ONLY, really ONLY if the MTA receives the mail per sendmail. I woul
Csillag Krist?f wrote:
>
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
Soren isn't entirely right. In practice its more sane for the MUA to
process, then remove, t
Hi,
On 18 Jan 2003 16:22:48 +0100, Csillag =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Krist=F3f?= writes:
>Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
>mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
>It should be done by the MTA.
> [...]
>So I guess this is a bug in the sen
I also checked exim packages 3.35-1 and 3.36-4 (from woody and sid).
All versions exhibit the same behavior.
I also tried KMail. It works properly, using the same local sendmail
program.
So I guess Evolution is using exim's sendmail program incorrectly.
ps. If you see my name e-mail address in t
Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
It should be done by the MTA.
So it is not Evolution's fault.
I am using Exim 3.36-3 from Sarge.
Evolution is configured to use /usr/sbin/sendmail for s
Csillag Krist?f wrote:
>
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
Soren isn't entirely right. In practice its more sane for the MUA to
process, then remove, t
I also checked exim packages 3.35-1 and 3.36-4 (from woody and sid).
All versions exhibit the same behavior.
I also tried KMail. It works properly, using the same local sendmail
program.
So I guess Evolution is using exim's sendmail program incorrectly.
ps. If you see my name e-mail address in t
Hi,
On 18 Jan 2003 16:22:48 +0100, Csillag =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Krist=F3f?= writes:
>Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
>mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
>It should be done by the MTA.
> [...]
>So I guess this is a bug in the sen
Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
It should be done by the MTA.
So it is not Evolution's fault.
I am using Exim 3.36-3 from Sarge.
Evolution is configured to use /usr/sbin/sendmail for s
10 matches
Mail list logo
