On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:28:26PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> 1. apt-get source bind
> 2. wget the pacth file from www.isc.org
> 3. apply the patch
> 4. dpkg-buildpackage
> 5. dpkg -i bind*.deb
That will conceivably work *now*. However, news of the vulnerability
was announced before the patche
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:28:26PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> 1. apt-get source bind
> 2. wget the pacth file from www.isc.org
> 3. apply the patch
> 4. dpkg-buildpackage
> 5. dpkg -i bind*.deb
That will conceivably work *now*. However, news of the vulnerability
was announced before the patche
On Thursday 14 November 2002 14:24, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:45:19PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> > Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
>
> Both potato and woody are vulnerable. Fixes are on there way, but
> disclosure of this vulnera
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:45:19PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
Both potato and woody are vulnerable. Fixes are on there way, but
disclosure of this vulnerability was very badly organized (not by the
security team), and the se
Someone needs to be more careful with their auto-blacklist. This
message was reported to Razor and is NOT spam...tisk tisk.
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 at 01:04:51PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> ?b 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14 ?P???| 12:45?AMike Dresser ?g?D:
> > Any word from the security team on what's g
On Thursday 14 November 2002 14:24, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:45:19PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> > Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
>
> Both potato and woody are vulnerable. Fixes are on there way, but
> disclosure of this vulnera
在 2002 十一月 14 星期四 12:45,Mike Dresser 寫道:
> Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
>
> Mike
http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21469
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security.html
Is the Woody bind also vulnerable?
--
Patrick Hsi
Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
Mike
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 11:45:19PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
Both potato and woody are vulnerable. Fixes are on there way, but
disclosure of this vulnerability was very badly organized (not by the
security team), and the se
Someone needs to be more careful with their auto-blacklist. This
message was reported to Razor and is NOT spam...tisk tisk.
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 at 01:04:51PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> ?b 2002 ?Q?@?? 14 ?P???| 12:45?AMike Dresser ?g?D:
> > Any word from the security team on what's going on wit
¦b 2002 ¤Q¤@¤ë 14 ¬P´Á¥| 12:45¡AMike Dresser ¼g¹D:
> Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
>
> Mike
http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21469
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security.html
Is the Woody bind also vulnerable?
--
P
Any word from the security team on what's going on with potato's bind?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo