On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:03:19PM +0100, InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez wrote:
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:03:19PM +0100, InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez wrote:
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any
Hi list, Here I am again and a happy newyear to all :)
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 20:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver
On Wednesday, 25 December 2002 21:54, Richard wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
bind stopped working.
Take a look at memory usage when
El Lun 30 Dic 2002 08:16, Berend De Schouwer escribió:
I've made the mistake of running bind with debugging (to find one bug), and
have bind create a 2GB /var/named/named.run file. Bind crashed because
that file was too big. Doh! If your Bind crashes regularly after X days,
see if its
On Wednesday, 25 December 2002 21:54, Richard wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
bind stopped working.
Take a look at memory usage when
El Lun 30 Dic 2002 08:16, Berend De Schouwer escribió:
I've made the mistake of running bind with debugging (to find one bug), and
have bind create a 2GB /var/named/named.run file. Bind crashed because
that file was too big. Doh! If your Bind crashes regularly after X days,
see if its
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and
bind 8 (not sure of
El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió:
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 512
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9) was stopped. It was up when I left at
: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:03:19 +0100
InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer
for about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9) was stopped. It was up when I left at
: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:03:19 +0100
InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer
for about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
bind stopped working.
Take a look at memory usage when Bind stop's working and monitor for some
time how much
20 matches
Mail list logo
