Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-21 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2008-04-21, Lee Glidewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 20 April 2008 11:56:07 pm Johann Spies wrote: >> >> The fact that there are regular updates shows that the product is >> constantly developing. That does not necessarily mean that it is an >> inferior product to closed source > Ce

Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-21 Thread Lee Glidewell
On Sunday 20 April 2008 11:56:07 pm Johann Spies wrote: > > The fact that there are regular updates shows that the product is > constantly developing. That does not necessarily mean that it is an > inferior product to closed source Certainly not. What should be said here, though, is that anti-viru

Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-21 Thread Johann Spies
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:06:01AM +0200, Jan Luehr wrote: > we're using ClamAV on our mail server for scanning incomming mail server-side > on Etch. However, looking back at ClamAV's history (DSA-1320-1, DSA-1366-1, > DSA-1435-1, DSA-1479, DSA-1549) makes me feel a little bit uneasy. To be > h

Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-18 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Martin S said: > Jan Luehr skrev: > >What Do you think about this? Do you know reasons for ClamAV's unusual > >high number of bugs? Would you abandon ClamAV for server side mail > >scanning in favor of other scanners? > Are you sure it has a "unusual high" number of b

Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-17 Thread Martin S
Jan Luehr skrev: What Do you think about this? Do you know reasons for ClamAV's unusual high number of bugs? Would you abandon ClamAV for server side mail scanning in favor of other scanners? Are you sure it has a "unusual high" number of bugs? I have no experience in OS antivirus solutions, us

Re: ClamAV concerns

2008-04-17 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi Yanosz, Jan Luehr wrote: we're using ClamAV on our mail server for scanning incomming mail server-side on Etch. However, looking back at ClamAV's history (DSA-1320-1, DSA-1366-1, DSA-1435-1, DSA-1479, DSA-1549) makes me feel a little bit uneasy. To be honest, ClamAV had more remote exploitab

ClamAV concerns

2008-04-17 Thread Jan Luehr
Hello, we're using ClamAV on our mail server for scanning incomming mail server-side on Etch. However, looking back at ClamAV's history (DSA-1320-1, DSA-1366-1, DSA-1435-1, DSA-1479, DSA-1549) makes me feel a little bit uneasy. To be honest, ClamAV had more remote exploitable holes than all of