Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that most people here don't like CR systems, and I'd have to
agree with that consensus.
I'm just wondering what is the general feeling about using hashcash
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rens Houben) wrote:
Why bother, when said windows machines will have perfectly good
signatures stored on them somewhere already?
Russell Presumably the signature would be based on the
On 16 Jun 2004, Hubert Chan wrote:
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin will check for hashcash in the future. Support is already
present in the development version of SpamAssassin.
Daniel == Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 16 Jun 2004, Hubert Chan wrote:
SpamAssassin will check for hashcash in the future. Support is
already present in the development version of SpamAssassin.
Daniel ...makes you wonder how long it will take before someone does
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:10AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
tokens in order to get any effect from SpamAssassin. Other than using
zombies, I don't think spammers could afford to generate real tokens
for every recipient.
Well, since there are millions of vulnerable systems all over the 'net
that
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that most people here don't like CR systems, and I'd have to
agree with that consensus.
I'm just wondering what is the general feeling about using hashcash
On 16 Jun 2004, Hubert Chan wrote:
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin will check for hashcash in the future. Support is already
present in the development version of SpamAssassin.
Daniel == Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 16 Jun 2004, Hubert Chan wrote:
SpamAssassin will check for hashcash in the future. Support is
already present in the development version of SpamAssassin.
Daniel ...makes you wonder how long it will take before someone does
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:38:10AM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
tokens in order to get any effect from SpamAssassin. Other than using
zombies, I don't think spammers could afford to generate real tokens
for every recipient.
Well, since there are millions of vulnerable systems all over the 'net
It seems that most people here don't like CR systems, and I'd have to
agree with that consensus.
I'm just wondering what is the general feeling about using hashcash and
other header signatures systems.
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that most people here don't like CR systems, and I'd have to
agree with that consensus.
I'm just wondering what is the general feeling about using hashcash and
other header signatures systems.
Currently you can't
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has been seen
typing:
Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those signatures
anyway...
Why bother, when said windows machines will have perfectly good
signatures stored on them somewhere already?
--
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rens Houben) wrote:
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has
been seen typing:
Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those
signatures anyway...
Why bother, when said windows machines will
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:34, Patrick Maheral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that most people here don't like CR systems, and I'd have to
agree with that consensus.
I'm just wondering what is the general feeling about using hashcash and
other header signatures systems.
Currently you can't
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has been
seen typing:
Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those signatures
anyway...
Why bother, when said windows machines will have perfectly good
signatures stored on them somewhere already?
--
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rens Houben) wrote:
In other news for Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:24:05PM +1000, Russell Coker has
been seen typing:
Besides, with an army of Windows Zombies you could generate those
signatures anyway...
Why bother, when said windows machines will
16 matches
Mail list logo
