Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > It had to be re-installed. You probably know that since you've read
> > the announcement we were able to send out before the machine was taken
> > down for reinstallation.
>
> That announcement wasn't delivered for all users until _after_ murphy
> was resurrected. I my
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > It had to be re-installed. You probably know that since you've read
> > the announcement we were able to send out before the machine was taken
> > down for reinstallation.
>
> That announcement wasn't delivered for all users until _after_ murphy
> was resurrected. I my
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:14:19AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I'll disagree with Martin's comment that the server compromise didn't
> constitute a security issue despite the lack of an archive compromise.
> For someone well versed in Debian procedures, it might have been
> plausible that the a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:14:19AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> I'll disagree with Martin's comment that the server compromise didn't
> constitute a security issue despite the lack of an archive compromise.
> For someone well versed in Debian procedures, it might have been
> plausible that the a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I learnt on /. that it had been a password compromise, so that meant, it
> was in the generic class of problems. We're always vulnerable towards
> that. But, we're all likely to be vulnerable to the local exploit used
> to gain r
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> I learnt on /. that it had been a password compromise, so that meant, it
> was in the generic class of problems. We're always vulnerable towards
> that. But, we're all likely to be vulnerable to the local exploit used
> to gain r
On Friday 28 November 2003 13:14, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>That announcement wasn't delivered for all users until _after_ murphy
>was resurrected. I myself got the debian-security-announce message
>mailed Nov 21 on 25 Nov 2003 15:16:56 -0800.
Hm, I got that late too, but the (unsigned) announceme
on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > To us debian users, the most notable thing during this break in or
> > whatever episode, is how the communication structures crumbled.
>
> It had to be re-installed. You probably know th
On Friday 28 November 2003 13:14, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>That announcement wasn't delivered for all users until _after_ murphy
>was resurrected. I myself got the debian-security-announce message
>mailed Nov 21 on 25 Nov 2003 15:16:56 -0800.
Hm, I got that late too, but the (unsigned) announceme
on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > To us debian users, the most notable thing during this break in or
> > whatever episode, is how the communication structures crumbled.
>
> It had to be re-installed. You probably know tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
