Thus the reason for posting to this list. the command was run as root.
Does the following theory seem plausable?
This is a kernel process for nfs over tcp
Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0
Thus the reason for posting to this list. the command was run as root.
Does the following theory seem plausable?
This is a kernel process for nfs over tcp
Ingo Strüwing wrote:
Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 01
Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
Did you run the c
Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
Did you run the comman
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:44:28AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
Yes NFS is running.. thoguht NFS was UDP not TCP
NFS has many pieces, some tcp and some udp.
Mike Stone
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:44:28AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
Yes NFS is running.. thoguht NFS was UDP not TCP
NFS has many pieces, some tcp and some udp.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes NFS is running.. thoguht NFS was UDP not TCP
netstat -natlp shows the process as "-"
a process of "-" huh?
the pid0 issue loooks like:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217525
Michael Stone wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0 192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is
Yes NFS is running.. thoguht NFS was UDP not TCP
netstat -natlp shows the process as "-"
a process of "-" huh?
the pid0 issue loooks like:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217525
Michael Stone wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
Ho
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
add the -p switch to netstat, which will give you the PID that is
associated with that socket.
pgpyH61MipHbf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0 192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0 192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is usi
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
add the -p switch to netstat, which will give you the PID that is
associated with that socket.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
How do i find out what is using those ports?
netstat -natl | grep 799
tcp0 0 192.168.1.200:799
192.168.1.1:2049ESTABLISHED
below returns no output
lsof -i tcp:799
Nothing is using the port but it is in netstat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
14 matches
Mail list logo