]
# Subject: Re: New IIS worm
#
#
# On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
# Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Doesn't this leave you open to DOS attacks? I'm thinking
# that source IP
# addresses are relatively easy to forge, and hence an
# attacher can forge
@lists.debian.org
# Subject: Re: New IIS worm
#
#
# On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
# Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Doesn't this leave you open to DOS attacks? I'm thinking
# that source IP
# addresses are relatively easy to forge, and hence
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't this leave you open to DOS attacks? I'm thinking that source IP
addresses are relatively easy to forge, and hence an attacher can forge
a nimda attach and cause you to block off
Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't this leave you open to DOS attacks? I'm thinking that source IP
addresses are relatively easy to forge, and hence an attacher can forge
a nimda attach and cause you to block off legitimate IP addresses -
ie. your DNS server our default
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:08:40PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
Karl E. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't this leave you open to DOS attacks? I'm thinking that source IP
addresses are relatively easy to forge, and hence an attacher can forge
a nimda attach and cause you to block off
Blowers wrote:
You could use the hosts.deny file for this also, no?
Best Regards, Allen
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Valliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New IIS worm
(2001-09-18
Blowers wrote:
You could use the hosts.deny file for this also, no?
Best Regards, Allen
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Valliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New IIS worm
for this also, no?
Best Regards, Allen
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Valliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New IIS worm
(2001-09-18) Emmanuel Valliet sed :
| I know we don't care on linux, but I
You could use the hosts.deny file for this also, no?
Best Regards, Allen
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Valliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New IIS worm
(2001-09-18) Emmanuel Valliet sed
You could use the hosts.deny file for this also, no?
Best Regards, Allen
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Valliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New IIS worm
(2001-09-18) Emmanuel Valliet
(2001-09-18) Emmanuel Valliet sed :
|
| I know we don't care on linux, but I have reallly a lot of hits from
| machine querying for the ..%%35c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe and Cie.
| And it starts to make a lot of apache childs, and the global charge
| grows consequently.
| Is there a way to
(2001-09-18) Emmanuel Valliet sed :
|
| I know we don't care on linux, but I have reallly a lot of hits from
| machine querying for the ..%%35c../winnt/system32/cmd.exe and Cie.
| And it starts to make a lot of apache childs, and the global charge
| grows consequently.
| Is there a way to
12 matches
Mail list logo