Rich Puhek schrieb:
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a
Rich Puhek schrieb:
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a ras
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on i
, 4 March 2003 12:35
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jeremy T. Bouse
Subject: Re: Sendmail vulnerability : is Debian falling behind?
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot
Quoting Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have already issued
> > patches.link
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on iss
, 4 March 2003 12:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeremy T. Bouse
Subject: Re: Sendmail vulnerability : is Debian falling behind?
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on issues
arelady being dealt w
Quoting Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat
On Monday 03 March 2003 23:06, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> > In case noone noticed, news of a Sendmail vulnerability appeared
> > on Slashdot. The really interesting piece of the story for me was the
> > portion of the blurb with said "...RedHat and OpenBSD have already issued
> > patches.link
It's been discussed plenty on the Debian mailing lists as well
as having the package maintainer give an update on the status of the
packages that are being prepared/ready at this time... Might suggest
checking a bit further before making such a rash judgement on issues
arelady being dealt w
12 matches
Mail list logo
