Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I should've taken this off of the list already, but ah well...)
> i tend to prefer top-posting except when responding point by point
> between paragraphs. admittedly, it's lazy and encourages excessive
> quoting, but this just feels awkward. i'll
Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I should've taken this off of the list already, but ah well...)
> i tend to prefer top-posting except when responding point by point
> between paragraphs. admittedly, it's lazy and encourages excessive
> quoting, but this just feels awkward. i'll
Moin,
* Stelios Bounanos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-10 22:29]:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:29 -0700, Christian G Warden
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was runoured to have said:
>
> > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> >> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:29 -0700, Christian G Warden
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was runoured to have said:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> (Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted text
Moin,
* Stelios Bounanos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-05-10 22:29]:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:29 -0700, Christian G Warden
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was runoured to have said:
>
> > On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> >> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
> On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:53:29 -0700, Christian G Warden
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was runoured to have said:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> (Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted tex
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted text? Top-posting
> is quite irritating, IMHO)
>
> > i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
> > abo
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted text? Top-posting
> is quite irritating, IMHO)
>
> > i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
> > ab
Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted text? Top-posting
is quite irritating, IMHO)
> i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
> about a week and it was very good at catching spam, but occassionally it
> woul
Christian G. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Could you please post your reply *below* the quoted text? Top-posting
is quite irritating, IMHO)
> i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
> about a week and it was very good at catching spam, but occassionally it
> wou
> "Christian" == Christian G Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christian> i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had
Christian> it setup for about a week and it was very good at
Christian> catching spam, but occassionally it would drive the cpu
Christian> load int
i just want to add a warning about spamassassin. i had it setup for
about a week and it was very good at catching spam, but occassionally it
would drive the cpu load into the 20s. i didn't spend any time trying
to track down the problem. i was using procmail to send all my mail
through SA so may
Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*.
>
> i don't think so. i think spam is a problem *all* have!
That's true, fair enough. But in the end, if you don't wanna receive any
spam, you should set up good Procmail recipes. Or, the easy way; install
Sp
> If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*.
i don't think so. i think spam is a problem *all* have! a first step
would be if mailinglist (this include) drop any html mail. next step
could be to remove those with 'unsubscibe' in the subject >;>
> I recommend visiting http://www.spamassassin.or
> If you don't want any spam, it's up to *you*.
i don't think so. i think spam is a problem *all* have! a first step
would be if mailinglist (this include) drop any html mail. next step
could be to remove those with 'unsubscibe' in the subject >;>
> I recommend visiting http://www.spamassassin.o
Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can someone plz remove the html spamer and also disable html for the
> mailinglist(s)?
What about setting up some Procmail recipe, which would handle this?
I used to use my own recipes, but once I tried SpamAssassin I'm not
willing to give it up for any pr
Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can someone plz remove the html spamer and also disable html for the
> mailinglist(s)?
What about setting up some Procmail recipe, which would handle this?
I used to use my own recipes, but once I tried SpamAssassin I'm not
willing to give it up for any p
17 matches
Mail list logo
