On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:40:05PM +, Paul Hink wrote:
> Does this mean that it is possible that known and fixed (!) security
> problems are not being corrected in Debian for nearly 5 months? Even
> though this may be a minor problem, I would like to see it fixed as
> soon as possible.
Trollb
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>> I don't mean to be paranoid but this advisory is dated February 1st,
>> 2004 but the new changelog entries are both dated 11 Sep 2003 and
>> the deb file for i386 I got has a timestamp o
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 10:40:05PM +, Paul Hink wrote:
> Does this mean that it is possible that known and fixed (!) security
> problems are not being corrected in Debian for nearly 5 months? Even
> though this may be a minor problem, I would like to see it fixed as
> soon as possible.
Trollb
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>> I don't mean to be paranoid but this advisory is dated February 1st,
>> 2004 but the new changelog entries are both dated 11 Sep 2003 and
>> the deb file for i386 I got has a timestamp o
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>
> > - --
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 431-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimm
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>
> > - --
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 431-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 431-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimmerman
> February 1st, 2004
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> - --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 431-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimmerman
> February 1st, 2004
8 matches
Mail list logo
