Re: Upcoming changes in advisory format

2011-01-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> The side-effect of that is that you are now listing only the source >> package name, and not anymore the binary package names. But to do the >> upgrade, the administrator of the machine has to select the binary >> packages for upgrade, or, to check if the testing/sid version the >> machine has

Re: Upcoming changes in advisory format

2011-01-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > >> Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums >> of the updated packages. > >> Since apt cryptographically enforces the integrity of the archive >> for quite some time now

Re: Upcoming changes in advisory format

2011-01-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:53:56AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > The side-effect of that is that you are now listing only the source > package name, and not anymore the binary package names. But to do the > upgrade, the administrator of the machine has to select the binary > packages for upgr

Re: Upcoming changes in advisory format

2011-01-06 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums > of the updated packages. > Since apt cryptographically enforces the integrity of the archive > for quite some time now, we've decided to finally drop the h