On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 10:59:02AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Greetings from the cold North that is the state of Michigan,
> Thank you. I think the weakness is due to the password-based authentication.
> The attacker can use dictionary attack to pass the authentication,right?
Incorrect, there ar
O
>
> Another question is, is there any IPSEC-based VPDN solution?
I mean, is there any PKI-based opensource VPDN solution?
--
Patrick Hsieh<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Pubilc Key at http://www.ezplay.tv/~pahud/pahudatezplay.pubkey
MD5 checksum: b948362c94655b74b33e859d58b8de91
1024D/F3662014 9AD
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 10:59:02AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Greetings from the cold North that is the state of Michigan,
> Thank you. I think the weakness is due to the password-based authentication.
> The attacker can use dictionary attack to pass the authentication,right?
Incorrect, there ar
On Monday 18 November 2002 22:56, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 at 04:07:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2.
> > There is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. Wit
O
>
> Another question is, is there any IPSEC-based VPDN solution?
I mean, is there any PKI-based opensource VPDN solution?
--
Patrick Hsieh<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Pubilc Key at http://www.ezplay.tv/~pahud/pahudatezplay.pubkey
MD5 checksum: b948362c94655b74b33e859d58b8de91
1024D/F3662014 9AD
On Monday 18 November 2002 22:56, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 at 04:07:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2.
> > There is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. Wit
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 at 04:07:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2.
> There
> is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. With this
mschapv2 == unsecure. TONS of paprs on the net if you wi
Hi Patrick,
You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2. There
is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. With this
sollution you can use the default windows vpn client. But i think this isn't
really safe.
Grtnx,
Robbert
Citeren Patrick Hsieh <
Hello Maik M8acter backward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I am looking for a VPDN solution for Linux and Windows. But openvpn does
not seem to have Windows client. I've tried frees/wan on Linux, but it
is not that easy to implement frees/wan client on Windows. Well, there
is pptp client on Windows and serv
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 at 04:07:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2. There
> is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. With this
mschapv2 == unsecure. TONS of paprs on the net if you wish
Hi Patrick,
You can use poptop, its possible to get higher encryption with mschapv2. There
is a kernel patch for mschapv2. And you must run pppd 2.4.1. With this
sollution you can use the default windows vpn client. But i think this isn't
really safe.
Grtnx,
Robbert
Citeren Patrick Hsieh <
Hello Maik M8acter backward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
I am looking for a VPDN solution for Linux and Windows. But openvpn does
not seem to have Windows client. I've tried frees/wan on Linux, but it
is not that easy to implement frees/wan client on Windows. Well, there
is pptp client on Windows and serv
12 matches
Mail list logo
