-security@lists.debian.org
Objet : Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did
* Sébastien Desse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a lot of discution about snort 1.9 on woody.
I just whant to tell that we do need the 1.9 !
why don't we use an another directory (like contrib) where we can put
unstable softwares built for the stable distribution ?
I would appreciate this,
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:43:48AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:52:06 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[re: installing the snort binary from unstable]
... And I prefer not to install unstable glibc on my stable systems.
Yeah - I thought there was a big problem with
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick Boyce!
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 17:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This has been discussed before. The thing is, I think that if you're
serious about using snort, you should not even consider using the one in
Debian. snort.org doesn't
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get source -b snort
And the snort updates?
Yes, they are built from the
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:52:06 -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[re: installing the snort binary from unstable]
... And I prefer not to
install unstable glibc on my stable systems.
Yeah - I thought there was a big problem with installing any unstable
*binary* on a stable box, for exactly that reason.
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 17:42, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This has been discussed before. The thing is, I think that if you're
serious about using snort, you should not even consider using the one in
Debian. snort.org doesn't
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
apt-get build-dep snort apt-get source -b snort
And the snort updates?
Yes, they are built from the
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:32:21AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being useless should be added
to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some
advice about getting signature
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:32:21AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being useless should be added
to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some
advice about getting signature
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:51:11 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being useless should be added
to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some
advice about getting
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:51:11 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being useless should be added
to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some
advice about getting
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
IIRC important new versions of existing packages are allowed into
point releases, so maybe Woody's main Snort engine binary packages can
be updated when 3.0r1 happens.
That won't happen sorry. That's
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being useless should be added
to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some
advice about getting signature updates (i.e. roll your own).
Why not file a bug?
IIRC
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
IIRC important new versions of existing packages are allowed into
point releases, so maybe Woody's main Snort engine binary packages can
be updated when 3.0r1 happens.
That won't happen sorry. That's
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
If so, are there any special steps required to integrate such a
download into our Debian Woody system ?
Yes. See below.
Alternatively, I note there are later signature packages in testing
and unstable - can we use those
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I searched the debian-security archive but didn't hit any items
discussing this, so maybe it's a dumb question - sorry, I'm a newb
here.
Thanks for _any_ comments at all.
Well, the version I am running at this time is Version 1.9.0
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This has been discussed before. The thing is, I think that if you're
serious about using snort, you should not even consider using the one in
Debian. snort.org doesn't even distribute up-to-date rules files for
the version
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 04:18:52 +, I wrote:
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
Well thanks for the answers folks
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
If so, are there any special steps required to integrate such a
download into our Debian Woody system ?
Yes. See below.
Alternatively, I note there are later signature packages in testing
and unstable - can we use those
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
This has been discussed before. The thing is, I think that if you're
serious about using snort, you should not even consider using the one in
Debian. snort.org doesn't even distribute up-to-date rules files for
the version
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 04:18:52 +, I wrote:
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
Well thanks for the answers folks
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
The snort-rules-default package available in stable never gets updated
- nor
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
This has been
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
The snort-rules-default package available in stable never gets updated
- nor
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:18:52AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
I've been running Snort for a month or so now on a Woody box at work,
and am now wondering whether the Debian Project (or packager) has a
Plan for providing signature file updates to users of the stable
distribution.
This has been
30 matches
Mail list logo
