On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> tags 144857 + patch
It compiles like fresh water now. Thanks a lot. :-)
Massimiliano
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> tags 144857 + patch
It compiles like fresh water now. Thanks a lot. :-)
Massimiliano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 144857 + patch
thanks
Package: libpam-sfs
Version: 0.2.2
Followup-For: Bug #144857
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:43:16PM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
> libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
> l
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:26:40PM +0100, Alan James wrote:
> >Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
> >libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
> >libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
> >can't seem to find it:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:02:54 +0200, Massimiliano Mirra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
>libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
>libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
>can't se
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:24:17PM +0800, SDiZ (UHome) wrote:
> >Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
> >libsfscrypt, though.
>
> did you add non-US source ?
> some crypt program have not moved to main yet..
Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-ge
tags 144857 + patch
thanks
Package: libpam-sfs
Version: 0.2.2
Followup-For: Bug #144857
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:43:16PM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
> libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
>
Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
libsfscrypt, though.
did you add non-US source ?
some crypt program have not moved to main yet..
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > $ apt-get source libpam-sfs
> > E: Unable to find a source package for libpam-sfs
> Make sure you have a deb-src entry for non-us in
> /etc/apt/sources.list
Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:26:40PM +0100, Alan James wrote:
> >Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
> >libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
> >libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
> >can't seem to find it:
Previously Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> Long version:
>
> $ apt-get source libpam-sfs
> E: Unable to find a source package for libpam-sfs
Make sure you have a deb-src entry for non-us in /etc/apt/sources.list
(and run apt-get update after adding it).
> So I got it from SourceForge (libpam-sfs
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:01:42PM +0200, Laurent Luyckx wrote:
> You need the libgmp3-dev package for compiling...
Here already:
$ dpkg --status libgmp3-dev
Package: libgmp3-dev
Status: install ok installed
(And it's in the Build-Depends: of libpam-sfs, so dpkg-buildpackage
would have war
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:02:54 +0200, Massimiliano Mirra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
>libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
>libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
>can't s
You need the libgmp3-dev package for compiling...
Cheers.
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:56, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> I'm using the libpam-sfs PAM module, which lets users authenticate at
> login and for importing directories in one single step. The binary
> .deb that comes with Woody works fine.
I'm using the libpam-sfs PAM module, which lets users authenticate at
login and for importing directories in one single step. The binary
.deb that comes with Woody works fine. But...
Short version: when I try to compile it from source I hit a wall.
Anybody managed to compile it?
Long version:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:24:17PM +0800, SDiZ (UHome) wrote:
> >Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
> >libsfscrypt, though.
>
> did you add non-US source ?
> some crypt program have not moved to main yet..
Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-g
Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
> libsfscrypt, though.
did you add non-US source ?
some crypt program have not moved to main yet..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > $ apt-get source libpam-sfs
> > E: Unable to find a source package for libpam-sfs
> Make sure you have a deb-src entry for non-us in
> /etc/apt/sources.list
Duh, stoopid me. Of course now it apt-gets it. It still bombs on
Previously Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> Long version:
>
> $ apt-get source libpam-sfs
> E: Unable to find a source package for libpam-sfs
Make sure you have a deb-src entry for non-us in /etc/apt/sources.list
(and run apt-get update after adding it).
> So I got it from SourceForge (libpam-sf
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:01:42PM +0200, Laurent Luyckx wrote:
> You need the libgmp3-dev package for compiling...
Here already:
$ dpkg --status libgmp3-dev
Package: libgmp3-dev
Status: install ok installed
(And it's in the Build-Depends: of libpam-sfs, so dpkg-buildpackage
would have wa
You need the libgmp3-dev package for compiling...
Cheers.
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 11:56, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> I'm using the libpam-sfs PAM module, which lets users authenticate at
> login and for importing directories in one single step. The binary
> .deb that comes with Woody works fine.
I'm using the libpam-sfs PAM module, which lets users authenticate at
login and for importing directories in one single step. The binary
.deb that comes with Woody works fine. But...
Short version: when I try to compile it from source I hit a wall.
Anybody managed to compile it?
Long version:
22 matches
Mail list logo