Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> > So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered polite.
>
> Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
> debian lists.
That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian add
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
> > debian lists.
>
> That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian adds support for
> Mail-Followup-To in all the MUA's that it supports.
Do we *support*
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> > So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered polite.
>
> Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
> debian lists.
That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian adds
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:40:42PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> If you use a header that is not universally supported, or even
> supported by a fairly popular mail client (Mutt in this case) or
> frequently used (if not popular) MTA (Exchange in this case), then
> you can't really complain
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:40:42PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> If you use a header that is not universally supported, or even
> supported by a fairly popular mail client (Mutt in this case) or
> frequently used (if not popular) MTA (Exchange in this case), then
> you can't really complai
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:00:58PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
> > Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> > >> But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futh
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:00:58 -0800
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered
> polite.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:00:58PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
> > Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> > >> But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no fut
Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
> So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered polite.
Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
debian lists.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] T
* J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> >> But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher down this
> >> road.
>
> > Could you at least honor my Mail-Follo
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:00:58 -0800
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
>> Mail-Followup-To is a non-standard, un-RFC documented, generally
>> unsupported header.
> So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered
> polite.
Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
> So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered polite.
Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
debian lists.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] T
* J C Lawrence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011120 12:04]:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:57:05 -0600
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:50PM -0800, Petro wrote:
> >> But his is hugely off topic, and I'll go no futher down this
> >> road.
>
> > Could you at least honor my Mail-Foll
13 matches
Mail list logo
