On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 05:27 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Again? I wrote a bug about this years ago with a fix. I think is was
> just adding --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh to the configure call.
Your patch in response to 185594 added an RSH environment variable
definition to the configure invocation.
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote:
>> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
>> > Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
>> > whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and
Hi Andi,
On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
> > Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> > whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> > result.
> >
> > If noone minds we reu
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> result.
>
> If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u.
Is a bi
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 22:07 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Finally, I solved it this way:
>
> diff -u tar-1.14/debian/rules tar-1.14/debian/rules
> --- tar-1.14/debian/rules
> +++ tar-1.14/debian/rules
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> build-stamp:
> dh_testdir
>
> - $(MAKE)
> + RSH="/u
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
>> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
>> result.
>
> We tried to reproduc
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> result.
We tried to reproduce the bug with zobel, and finally discovered the Tr
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u.
Ok with me.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi mollo,
On Sunday, 19 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:19:58 +0100
> using tar 1.14-2.1
>
> fw:/home/mathieu# tar --rmt-command=/usr/sbin/rmt -cvf
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz' /etc tar:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz: Cannot open: Input/output
> error ta
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:19:58 +0100
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the stable distribution (sarge) this problem has been fixed in
> version 1.14-2.1.
>
This upgrade dont allow tar -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]:file syntax to be used.
ie. tar -cvf myhost:/dev/st0 /home
I've some sa
10 matches
Mail list logo