On Fri, 2 May 2003, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> I am not subscribed to debian-security, so please include me in your Cc:
> for this discussion.
>
Likewise.
> I have noticed a "fax" user was expected in mgetty-1.1.30 (never played
> with 1.1.29). The problem I have with that is that this user is req
Hi,
I am not subscribed to debian-security, so please include me in your Cc:
for this discussion.
I have noticed a "fax" user was expected in mgetty-1.1.30 (never played
with 1.1.29). The problem I have with that is that this user is required at
build time (during the make install phase). Anoth
* Drew Scott Daniels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030502 01:20]:
> [...]
There is as far as I can see (only) one important security enhancement
in the newer mgettys, and this is running the fax-out-scripts not
as root. There is no proof that the old mgettys are vulnerable, but
it's never a good idea to ru
I don't know whether potato, woody, sarge and sid should have a security
bug filed against them.
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mgetty.html sid has version
1.1.30-1, sarge has version 1.1.28-5, and woody has version 1.1.27-4.1.
Note that Debian packages contain changes. I have not lo
4 matches
Mail list logo