Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Christopher Taylor wrote:
since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over
a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in
libc-client (which I think is sensible).
You can re-enabl
c-client (which I think is sensible).
>
> unfortunately, though, some of my users need this functionality, so I'll
> have to swich the server. What I'm looking for is basically a drop-in
> replacement, i.e. a POP3-server that uses system accounts,
> /var/mail/ and doesn't nee
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Christopher Taylor wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> since the upgrade to sarge, UW-pop3d won't allow Plain-text logins over
> a non-SSL connection anymore. I've tracked this down to a change in
> libc-client (which I think is sensible).
You can re-enable plaint
wich the server. What I'm looking for is basically a drop-in
replacement, i.e. a POP3-server that uses system accounts,
/var/mail/ and doesn't need to be configured a lot.
teapop, popa3d and mailutils-pop3d seem quite promising in this respect,
what are your experiences?
BTW, perform
> What's this MiTM attact means?
Man in The Middle is when someone "between" you and the remote system
modifies packets on their way to the remote system or back, IIRC
--
Fredrik "Demonen" Vold
/*
- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and
good with ketchup.
*/
2005. június 14. 07:57,
Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-> debian-security@lists.debian.org,:
> Ian Eure wrote:
> >> On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
> >> I don't see why it would be helpful, unless you're trying to keep
>
> your info
>
> >> secret from a determined/resourceful attack
Ian Eure wrote:
>> On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
>> I don't see why it would be helpful, unless you're trying to keep
your info
>> secret from a determined/resourceful attacker. But an attacker like that
>> would probably get it anyways.
>>
>> I use TLS & PLAIN, and encrypt/sign my m
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:41 pm, LeVA wrote:
> 2005. június 14. 01:36,
> Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > PLAIN is easier to set up. IIRC, CRAM-MD5 requires a seperate password
> > file. Shouldn't be a risk if you're only using PLAIN over TLS.
>
> I understand that with TLS or SSL the clear text
2005. június 14. 01:36,
Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-> debian-security@lists.debian.org,:
> On Monday 13 June 2005 04:23 pm, LeVA wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl)
> > support. Now I can not decide
On Monday 13 June 2005 04:23 pm, LeVA wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl)
> support. Now I can not decide which combination of methods is the most
> secure (first of all) and most usefull (lastly) for me.
>
> The courie
Hi!
I've configured a courier-imap server with pop3(-ssl) and imap(-ssl) support.
Now I can not decide which combination of methods is the most secure (first of
all) and most usefull (lastly) for me.
The courier server supports both SSL and TLS, and I can use PLAIN and CRAM-MD5
method
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this might be of interest to both
lists. The debian-security folks might remember my initial mail on
the subject of setting up pop3-ssl with virtual users using popa3d[1].
At the time there appeared to be some interest from people implementing
a
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this might be of interest to both
lists. The debian-security folks might remember my initial mail on
the subject of setting up pop3-ssl with virtual users using popa3d[1].
At the time there appeared to be some interest from people implementing
a
Oops, sorry, first post in a bad list. Here's the correct one...
--- Begin Message ---
"Janus N." Tøndering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
> using the two?
Yes. /bin/true allow a ftp account, /bin/false no.
It's an old style ftp
Oops, sorry, first post in a bad list. Here's the correct one...
--- Begin Message ---
"Janus N." Tøndering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
> using the two?
Yes. /bin/true allow a ftp account, /bin/false no.
It's an old style ft
Janus N. Tøndering wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
/bin/false returns false, while /
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
> quite right.
> You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
> shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Janus
--
Janus Nørgaard Tøndering
email: janus(at)ba
Janus N. Tøndering wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
quite right.
You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
/bin/false returns false, while /b
* Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-02-03 22:53]:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
??
$ apt-cache show stunnel
Package: stunnel
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Paolo Mo
On Monday 10 February 2003 23:20, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
> > About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find
> > .deb packages of stunnel ?
>
> it's in non-U
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:30, Ross Currie wrote:
> quite right.
> You'll want to put something like /bin/false in your passwd file as the user's
> shell.
Both /bin/false and /bin/true has been suggested. Any difference in
using the two?
Janus
--
Janus Nørgaard Tøndering
email: janus(at)ba
Quoting vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
> Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
> >
> > mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
> >
> > x:~# login
> > x login: mdresser
> > Password:
> > Last
On Mon, 10/02/2003 10:53 +0100, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
It's in stable. You might want to recompile that package w
* vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
> at all, like that:
> leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
/--[ man 5 passwd ]:
| If this field is empty, it defaults to the value /bin/sh.
\--
/bin/false would be a better solution.
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 14:07]:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
>
> > > Hello all,
> >
> > I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> > provide secure pop3 service. Now I want
also sprach Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
it's in non-US, so include the non-US mirrors in your sources.list!
but i suggest you use courier
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
>
> mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
>
> x:~# login
> x login: mdresser
> Password:
> Last login: Mon Feb 10 16:23:51 2003 on pts/1
> Linux x 2.4.20 #1
also sprach Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2226 +0100]:
> That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
so put /bin/true for the shell.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
> few people, and I don't want them to
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, vincenzo wrote:
> You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
> at all, like that:
> leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
>
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Passwo
also sprach vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2156 +0100]:
> > I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
> > ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
> > service for only few people, and I don't want them to have
* Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-02-03 22:53]:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
??
$ apt-cache show stunnel
Package: stunnel
Priority: optional
Section: non-US
Installed-Size: 220
Maintainer: Paolo Mo
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:23:33 +0100
Kristof Goossens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
> ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
> service for only few people, and I don't want them to have
On Monday 10 February 2003 23:20, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
> > About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find
> > .deb packages of stunnel ?
>
> it's in non-U
Quoting vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
> Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
> >
> > mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
> >
> > x:~# login
> > x login: mdresser
> > Password:
> > Last
On Mon, 10/02/2003 10:53 +0100, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
It's in stable. You might want to recompile that package w
* vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
> at all, like that:
> leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
/--[ man 5 passwd ]:
| If this field is empty, it defaults to the value /bin/sh.
\--
/bin/false would be a better solution.
--
To UNS
* Bernard Lheureux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030210 14:07]:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
>
> > > Hello all,
> >
> > I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> > provide secure pop3 service. Now I want
also sprach Bernard Lheureux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2253 +0100]:
> About securing POP3, IMAP or SMTP, does someone know where I could find .deb
> packages of stunnel ?
it's in non-US, so include the non-US mirrors in your sources.list!
but i suggest you use courier
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:26:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
>
> mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
>
> x:~# login
> x login: mdresser
> Password:
> Last login: Mon Feb 10 16:23:51 2003 on pts/1
> Linux x 2.4.20 #1
also sprach Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2226 +0100]:
> That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
so put /bin/true for the shell.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin
On Saturday 08 February 2003 15:23, Kristof Goossens wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
> few people, and I don't want them to
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, vincenzo wrote:
> You can simply add them in the /etc/passwd file without giving any shell
> at all, like that:
> leon:x:1050:100::/home/leon:
>
That lets you in just fine unfortunately.
mdresser:x:1000:1000:Mike Dresser,,,:/home/mdresser:
x:~# login
x login: mdresser
Passwo
also sprach vincenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.2156 +0100]:
> > I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
> > ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
> > service for only few people, and I don't want them to have
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:23:33 +0100
Kristof Goossens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with
> ipop3d to provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this
> service for only few people, and I don't want them to have
very
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work
n and you've got a very
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my
n and you've got a very
flexible, fast and
secure mail server with good tools for you and your users...
vpopmail allows your to create virtual domains and users without having
to account them on your
linux box...
g.
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server
On Sat, 08/02/2003 03:52 +0100, Kuba Jakubik wrote:
> Kristof Goossens wrote:
>> /bin/false. So my question is: "Is it possible to create a pop3 account
>> without
>> needing to modify the /etc/passwd file?"
You should use a pop3 server that supports virtual use
Kristof Goossens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
> few people, and I don't want them to have an account
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, b
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:23:33PM +0100, Kristof Goossens wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
> few people, and I don't want them to ha
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, but no other access whats
On Sat, 08/02/2003 03:52 +0100, Kuba Jakubik wrote:
> Kristof Goossens wrote:
>> /bin/false. So my question is: "Is it possible to create a pop3 account
>> without
>> needing to modify the /etc/passwd file?"
You should use a pop3 server that supports virtual use
Kristof Goossens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
> provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
> few people, and I don't want them to have an account
Kristof Goossens wrote:
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, b
Hello all,
I need to make a pop3 account on my server. I intend to work with ipop3d to
provide secure pop3 service. Now I want to provide this service for only
few people, and I don't want them to have an account on the system. Well, they
can have a pop3 account, but no other access whats
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thanks, that was enlightening.
Yr. very welcome. I count it a major success when I can add clarity to
a traditionally flame-shrouded subject. ;->
* Rick Moen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> FYI:
> ...
>
Thanks, that was enlightening.
--
Scott Moynes http://www.icculus.org/openbox/
"Computer science is as much about computers
as astronomy is about telescopes." -- Dijkstra
pgpEbnR0C04Yr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
>> Sendmail certainly can't say that.
>
> Depends what your definition of "security hacks" is.
> http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qm
* Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
> Sendmail certainly can't say that.
Depends what your definition of "security hacks" is.
http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
sendmail is by no means perfect, but ne
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Thanks, that was enlightening.
Yr. very welcome. I count it a major success when I can add clarity to
a traditionally flame-shrouded subject. ;->
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
* Rick Moen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> FYI:
> ...
>
Thanks, that was enlightening.
--
Scott Moynes http://www.icculus.org/openbox/
"Computer science is as much about computers
as astronomy is about telescopes." -- Dijkstra
msg07333/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu 10 Oct 02 15:47, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
>
> > Try this.
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
>
> With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have
> authentication.
info exim.
You'll need to mess around with lookups and lsea
Quoting Scott Moynes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
>> Sendmail certainly can't say that.
>
> Depends what your definition of "security hacks" is.
> http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/q
* Michael Marziani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3 years.
> Sendmail certainly can't say that.
Depends what your definition of "security hacks" is.
http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
sendmail is by no means perfect, but n
Quoting Giacomo Mulas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls?
Not excessively difficult with any of the most-used MTAs, in any event.
Some (Postfix, Qmail, Exim) require patching/extensions or a prepatched
package. Some (Sendmail, Courier-MTA) do not.
On Thu 10 Oct 02 15:47, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
>
> > Try this.
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
>
> With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have
> authentication.
info exim.
You'll need to mess around with lookups and lse
Quoting Giacomo Mulas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls?
Not excessively difficult with any of the most-used MTAs, in any event.
Some (Postfix, Qmail, Exim) require patching/extensions or a prepatched
package. Some (Sendmail, Courier-MTA) do not.
Kaixo Giacomo Mulas!!!
> > I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
>
> What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
> my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
> many others. I _think_ (but did not try)
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
many others. I _think_ (but di
Kaixo Statu Nascendi!!!
> But have you been able to authenticate via SSL to qmail? i patched
> qmail-smtpd but i could either authenticate, or make ssl connection. never
> the both at the same time.
I prefere Sendmail, if not qmail...
Hi Christian Schuerer-Waldheim!!!
> Google is your friend!
Yes i know.. ;-)
> http://www.stunnel.org/patches/desc/syslog_danilche.html
>
>
> http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/stunnel.html
>
> http://www.octaldream.com/~scottm
D]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt i
Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
> Try this.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have authentication.
This also can be done with stunnel..
> I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
>
> * SMTP (
Hi!
> I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
>
> * SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
>+ incomming authentication SECURE
> to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
> with SSL
>
> * POP3 (i like qpopper)
>
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt in my mind that we made the
right decision switching to qmail.
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3
Try this.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
/Magnus Wiklander.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Iñaki Martínez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 10 oktober 2002 15:02
Till: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Ämne: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
Hi
Hi
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
+ incomming authentication SECURE
to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
with SSL
* POP3 (i like qpopper)
+ outgoing authentication SECURE
to
Kaixo Giacomo Mulas!!!
> > I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
>
> What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
> my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
> many others. I _think_ (but did not try
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> I need authentication + SSL (with/out stunnel/wrapper) to relay email.
What about one of the many MTAs which natively support tls? Off the top of
my head I remember the exim-tls and postfix-tls packages, there surely are
many others. I _think_ (but d
Kaixo Statu Nascendi!!!
> But have you been able to authenticate via SSL to qmail? i patched
> qmail-smtpd but i could either authenticate, or make ssl connection. never
> the both at the same time.
I prefere Sendmail, if not qmail...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi Christian Schuerer-Waldheim!!!
> Google is your friend!
Yes i know.. ;-)
> http://www.stunnel.org/patches/desc/syslog_danilche.html
>
>
>http://www.stunnel.org/download/stunnel/mike.daewoo.com.pl/computer/stunnel/stunnel.html
>
> http://www.octaldream.com/~scottm
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail c
Kaixo Magnus Wiklander!!!
> Try this.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
With this a solve the SSL problem, but with SMTP i do not have authentication.
This also can be done with stunnel..
> I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
>
> * SMTP
Hi!
> I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
>
> * SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
>+ incomming authentication SECURE
> to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
> with SSL
>
> * POP3 (i like qpopper)
>
This is just my opinion, but I much prefer qmail to sendmail. There's
something to be said for using what you're familiar with, but coming
from the sendmail camp there is no doubt in my mind that we made the
right decision switching to qmail.
There have been no security hacks to qmail for over 3
Try this.
http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/sslwrap.html
/Magnus Wiklander.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Iñaki Martínez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Skickat: den 10 oktober 2002 15:02
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: SMTP and POP3 with ssl + login/password
Hi
I need to
Hi
I need to setup a Debian Woody server with th following:
* SMTP (i like sendmail) with:
+ incomming authentication SECURE
to send an email with this server it MUST be necessary authentication
with SSL
* POP3 (i like qpopper)
+ outgoing authentication SECURE
to
Hi guys, I am having one problem with pop3, I am using ipop3d and its working
fine to receive messges from my local clients(in my LAN). But when i try to
get messages from external client(remote notebooks with dialup connection to
Internet using normal ISP) the connection is too slow, i can&#
Hi guys, I am having one problem with pop3, I am using ipop3d and its working
fine to receive messges from my local clients(in my LAN). But when i try to
get messages from external client(remote notebooks with dialup connection to
Internet using normal ISP) the connection is too slow, i can&#
I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
machine and send your mail back along the same connection, as if the server
,[ On Thu, Aug 02, at 12:20PM, Vineet Kumar wrote: ]--
| This is only the case if you use the -g option with ssh or have
| "GatewayPorts yes" in your config file. The default is (thankfully)
| "no". Otherwise, the forwarded port is bound to the localhost interface
| only.
The defa
hi ya
list of secure pop3 methodologies
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
> server using ssh. The problem is t
hi ya
list of secure pop3 methodologies
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
c ya
alvin
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
> server using ssh. The problem is t
* Michael Knoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010802 11:41]:
> I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
> port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
> server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
> mach
,[ On Thu, Aug 02, at 12:20PM, Vineet Kumar wrote: ]--
| This is only the case if you use the -g option with ssh or have
| "GatewayPorts yes" in your config file. The default is (thankfully)
| "no". Otherwise, the forwarded port is bound to the localhost interface
| only.
The defau
* Michael Knoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010802 11:41]:
> I have done this, and it is not hard. You have to connect SSH with local
> port forwarding on port 110. Then, set your mail client to use a pop3
> server on localhost. SSH will forward the pop3 request to the connected
> mach
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 10:49:53AM -0300, GARGIULO Eduardo INGDESI wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a smtp/pop3 server behind a firewall at work and I can login the
> server using ssh. The problem is that the port 110 is closed for external
> interface, so I can't get my emai
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
