RE: strange flickering ports

2001-06-18 Thread Michael R. Schwarzbach
g, 18. Juni 2001 09:21 > To: Sebastiaan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-security@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: strange flickering ports > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:14:54AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote: > > >Hi... > > > > > >I have a box with somet

RE: strange flickering ports

2001-06-18 Thread Michael R. Schwarzbach
g, 18. Juni 2001 09:21 > To: Sebastiaan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: strange flickering ports > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:14:54AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote: > > >Hi... > > > > > >I have a box with something listening to

Re: strange flickering ports

2001-06-18 Thread John Ferlito
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:14:54AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote: > >Hi... > > > >I have a box with something listening to "flickering" ports. nmap > >reports various random ports open from run to run. I can't telnet to > >them and ID w/ netstat, because they're gone the instant nmap finds > >them. > H

re: strange flickering ports

2001-06-18 Thread Sebastiaan
>Hi... > >I have a box with something listening to "flickering" ports. nmap >reports various random ports open from run to run. I can't telnet to >them and ID w/ netstat, because they're gone the instant nmap finds >them. Hi, I have this regularily too. I would like to see this explained, but pe

Re: strange flickering ports

2001-06-17 Thread John Ferlito
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:14:54AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote: > >Hi... > > > >I have a box with something listening to "flickering" ports. nmap > >reports various random ports open from run to run. I can't telnet to > >them and ID w/ netstat, because they're gone the instant nmap finds > >them. >

re: strange flickering ports

2001-06-17 Thread Sebastiaan
>Hi... > >I have a box with something listening to "flickering" ports. nmap >reports various random ports open from run to run. I can't telnet to >them and ID w/ netstat, because they're gone the instant nmap finds >them. Hi, I have this regularily too. I would like to see this explained, but p