On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 08:45:32PM +0200, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi Jason.
Jason Sopko wrote:
The Apache worm you're infected with was posted on bugtraq earlier
today. It exploits mod_ssl and can be identified by doing a ps -ax |
grep bugtraq (it runs as the name .bugtraq). The source for
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:13:39PM +0700, Tunggul A Siswoyo wrote:
Is debian woody vulnerable to this exploits?
AFAIK i didn't see any recent DSA (except DSA-135) mentioning this
hole.
Sorry, my stupidity :)
didn't see other posts before asking
please just ignore my previous post
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:13:39PM +0700, Tunggul A Siswoyo wrote:
Is debian woody vulnerable to this exploits?
AFAIK i didn't see any recent DSA (except DSA-135) mentioning this
hole.
Sorry, my stupidity :)
didn't see other posts before asking
please just ignore my previous post
Hi all.
The rlx blade server rack (better: the management blade) where my own
server is located in has been attacked. I phoned to my ISP some minutes
ago, and he described that there was a huge packet storm fired from the
internet towards the management blade.
He described that there were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Renzmann wrote:
| Hi all.
|
| The rlx blade server rack (better: the management blade) where my own
| server is located in has been attacked. I phoned to my ISP some minutes
| ago, and he described that there was a huge packet storm fired
Hi Jason.
Jason Sopko wrote:
The Apache worm you're infected with was posted on bugtraq earlier
today. It exploits mod_ssl and can be identified by doing a ps -ax |
grep bugtraq (it runs as the name .bugtraq). The source for it is here:
http://dammit.lt/apache-worm/apache-worm.c
Thanks a lot
6 matches
Mail list logo
