Alexander Hvostov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 20 April 2000 18:13:
Wichert,
I was able to do what he said to crash xfs remotely. God only knows how
that could be leveraged... No, Debian xfs is _not_ safe.
I just tried (version 3.3.6):
% telnet localhost 7100
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected
Previously Pedro Guerreiro wrote:
Is this still applyable to 3.3.6? Or to 4.0?
Our xfs is safe iirc. I think xfstt and xfs-tt are also safe. No
idea about 4.0..
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at
Wichert,
I was able to do what he said to crash xfs remotely. God only knows how
that could be leveraged... No, Debian xfs is _not_ safe.
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a---
Hi.
Is this still applyable to 3.3.6? Or to 4.0?
pmg
- Forwarded message from Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:09:23 +0100
From: Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BUGTRAQ@securityfocus.com
Subject: xfs security issues (fwd)
Hi,
I notice xfs (the X font server
4 matches
Mail list logo