Re: xfs security issues (fwd)

2000-04-22 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Alexander Hvostov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 20 April 2000 18:13: Wichert, I was able to do what he said to crash xfs remotely. God only knows how that could be leveraged... No, Debian xfs is _not_ safe. I just tried (version 3.3.6): % telnet localhost 7100 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected

Re: xfs security issues (fwd)

2000-04-21 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Pedro Guerreiro wrote: Is this still applyable to 3.3.6? Or to 4.0? Our xfs is safe iirc. I think xfstt and xfs-tt are also safe. No idea about 4.0.. Wichert. -- _ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at

Re: xfs security issues (fwd)

2000-04-21 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Wichert, I was able to do what he said to crash xfs remotely. God only knows how that could be leveraged... No, Debian xfs is _not_ safe. Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCM d- s:+ a---

xfs security issues (fwd)

2000-04-20 Thread Pedro Guerreiro
Hi. Is this still applyable to 3.3.6? Or to 4.0? pmg - Forwarded message from Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 01:09:23 +0100 From: Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: BUGTRAQ@securityfocus.com Subject: xfs security issues (fwd) Hi, I notice xfs (the X font server