Hi,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2019, Sophie Brun wrote:
> > On 6/2/19 17:57, Christian Kastner wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-05 16:27, Sophie Brun wrote:
> Please note that the problem itself is with the autopkgtest of the
> package, build is ok, you will only spot it if you enable such tests.
> That
/github.com/JPaulMora/Pyrit/commit/17331e373695d51f147e0baa1025eb4f9a3144b5
New pyrit version doesn't break pyrit-opencl.
Pyrit and pyrit-opencl were different projects but now J.P. Mora
includes the modules in the pyrit package. So I think we should see
with the maintainer if he's ok to remove the source package pyrit-opencl
and build the binary package pyrit-opencl with the source package pyrit.
Sophie
On 6/2/19 17:57, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2019-02-05 16:27, Sophie Brun wrote:
>>> Please note that the problem itself is with the autopkgtest of the
>>> package, build is ok, you will only spot it if you enable such tests.
>>> That is: the package is not FTBFSing, but the autopkgtests are
On 2019-02-05 16:27, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> Please note that the problem itself is with the autopkgtest of the
>> package, build is ok, you will only spot it if you enable such tests.
>> That is: the package is not FTBFSing, but the autopkgtests are
>> failing.
>
> I push a fix for the autopkgtest
Hi all,
Le 05/02/2019 à 00:50, Samuel Henrique a écrit :
> Hello Marcos,
>
> I don't use sbuild but pbuilder and the package built OK on my machine.
>
> Anyway, as buildd's use sbuild (AFAIK), i think that this issue
> needs to be investigated. I will try to put some time tomorrow
>
Hello Marcos,
> I don't use sbuild but pbuilder and the package built OK on my machine.
>
> Anyway, as buildd's use sbuild (AFAIK), i think that this issue needs to
> be investigated. I will try to put some time tomorrow
>
Please note that the problem itself is with the autopkgtest of the package,
Hello Samuel
I don't use sbuild but pbuilder and the package built OK on my machine.
Anyway, as buildd's use sbuild (AFAIK), i think that this issue needs to
be investigated. I will try to put some time tomorrow.
Greetings,
Marcos
On 4/2/19 22:11, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tried to
Hello,
Tried to build 0.5.1+git20180801-1 from the git repo using sbuild[0] but
the tests from autopkgtest are not passing:
autopkgtest [20:57:40]: test unittests-default: [---
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "test_pyrit.py", line 41, in
> import cpyrit.conf
On 04.02.19 12:01, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> However, I'm not familiar how strict pkg-security is with their repos,
>> and whether rebasing (even a rather harmless one, as in this case), is
>> strictly forbidden.
>
> We have no strict policy. Feel fr
Hi,
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Seeing as master is only a few hours old, and hasn't been tagged yet
> (and probably not even seen yet), I'd even consider rebasing master back
> to 0.4.0-8 and starting the merge over, on a separate branch, and
>
> (1) Carrying out the upstre
Hi all,
On 03.02.19 18:17, Marcos Fouces wrote:
> Hello Sophie
>
> I already uploaded the repo [0]. I tried to merge all the work on both
> distros (Kali and Debian).
>
> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/pyrit.git
an initial review, after having skimmed over the changes:
* I pro
Hello Sophie
I already uploaded the repo [0]. I tried to merge all the work on both
distros (Kali and Debian).
[0] https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/pyrit.git
Thanks to Samuel to create it.
Greetings,
Marcos.
On 2/2/19 14:36, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01.02.19 15:36
Hi all,
Le 03/02/2019 à 00:25, Marcos Fouces a écrit :
> On 2/2/19 14:36, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On 01.02.19 15:36, Sophie Brun wrote:
>>> It would be great to upload it quickly to have it in Buster.
>> Seeing as the time window for Buster was indeed extremely short, I went
>> a
On 2/2/19 14:36, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 01.02.19 15:36, Sophie Brun wrote:
>> It would be great to upload it quickly to have it in Buster.
> Seeing as the time window for Buster was indeed extremely short, I went
> ahead and uploaded a version that fixes the FTBFS from #906555
Hi all,
On 01.02.19 15:36, Sophie Brun wrote:
> It would be great to upload it quickly to have it in Buster.
Seeing as the time window for Buster was indeed extremely short, I went
ahead and uploaded a version that fixes the FTBFS from #906555 by
incorporating a simple patch taken from the other/
Hi,
Le 01/02/2019 à 11:06, Christian Kastner a écrit :
>> On 31.01.19 23:21, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>>> Hello Christian and team,
>>> I did some work on the package and i would like to upload it to our
>>> repo. It should be very good if you, or someone else, could help me to
>>> co-maintain it.
>
Hi all,
On 31.01.19 23:31, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> On 31.01.19 23:21, Marcos Fouces wrote:
>> Hello Christian and team,
>>
>> some time ago, we talk to you to ask that it should be good to import
>> pyrit package to our team to take care of it because a RC bug
Hello Marcos,
Created:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/pyrit
Please note that if you want to see pyrit on Buster, you only have some
days left until the soft freeze.
Thanks,
--
Samuel Henrique
Hello Christian and team,
some time ago, we talk to you to ask that it should be good to import
pyrit package to our team to take care of it because a RC bug -that is
still open- is affecting the wifite package. As far as i remember, you
expressed a full ACK to this.
I did some work on the
19 matches
Mail list logo
