Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-07-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:34:27 +0200 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2008 01:07, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > I think I've noticed another DSA with tracker inconsistencies. > > > > DSA-1615-1 [1] claims that several CVEs are fixed in > > > > xulrunner/1.9.0.1-1 for sid.  On the other han

Re: DSA-1615-1 vs. tracker

2008-07-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Friday 25 July 2008 01:07, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > I think I've noticed another DSA with tracker inconsistencies. > > > DSA-1615-1 [1] claims that several CVEs are fixed in > > > xulrunner/1.9.0.1-1 for sid.  On the other hand, most of these CVEs > > > (which are linked from the DSA tracker

Re: DSA-1618-1 vs. tracker

2008-07-26 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Francesco, * Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-26 18:43]: > DSA-1618-1 [1] has been recently issued and its tracker page seems to > suffer from the same issues I reported with respect to > DSA-1612-1 [2] ... :-( Hmpf, fixed. Thanks! Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.d

DSA-1618-1 vs. tracker

2008-07-26 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi once again! DSA-1618-1 [1] has been recently issued and its tracker page seems to suffer from the same issues I reported with respect to DSA-1612-1 [2] ... :-( Just to be clear, I'll repeat those issues in the following. The tracker page [3] lists the spurious CVE-2006-2662 [4] (which talks