Nico Golde wrote:
>
> What if we write a script that tracks NEW and checks that with the list of
> our NFUs and embedded code-copies list and write a mail to this list in
> case a NEW package needs review? Given the package is named properly this
> should be rather easy to script and work effectiv
Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> i think this is a great idea. i was a bit surprised by all of the old
> (2005/2006) issues that you converted from NFUs in your last tracker
> update.
There were actually some more, but I had doubts about marking them as they
were probably already fixed long ago, and
Hi,
* Raphael Geissert [2009-10-26 21:43]:
> Yesterday I went through the list of NFUs and reviewed some of those that I
> recognised as being in the archive. Although this process could be more or
> less automated by using the information by the NVD (in a similar way its
> use was mentioned on th
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:46:44 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I went through the list of NFUs and reviewed some of those that I
> recognised as being in the archive. Although this process could be more or
> less automated by using the information by the NVD (in a similar way its
Hi,
Yesterday I went through the list of NFUs and reviewed some of those that I
recognised as being in the archive. Although this process could be more or
less automated by using the information by the NVD (in a similar way its
use was mentioned on the other thread), there's also a gap between the
5 matches
Mail list logo
