On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2012-01-15 at 12:53 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
>> Package: security-tracker
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The tracker page [1] for DSA-2388-1 [2] looks OK, but some of the
>> referenced CVE tracker pages [3][
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:42:50 +0100 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2012-01-15 at 12:53 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > Assuming that the DSA is right and the tracker is wrong, please
> > fix this inconsistency.
[...]
>
> You're perfectly right, wheezy/sid doesn't have a fi
On dim., 2012-01-15 at 12:53 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: security-tracker
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
>
> The tracker page [1] for DSA-2388-1 [2] looks OK, but some of the
> referenced CVE tracker pages [3][4] claim that t1lib/5.1.2-3.3 is still
> vulnerable in wheezy and
Package: security-tracker
Severity: normal
Hi!
The tracker page [1] for DSA-2388-1 [2] looks OK, but some of the
referenced CVE tracker pages [3][4] claim that t1lib/5.1.2-3.3 is still
vulnerable in wheezy and sid, while the DSA [2] claims that all the
CVEs are fixed in wheezy and sid by t1lib/5.
4 matches
Mail list logo