Hi Salvatore,
On Montag, 15. September 2014, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Anyway, we seem the only two people invoved in this arguing ;-) I
> don't have time/energy to furhter defend my point of view. So if you
> think it really would help working on the tracker to invert the CVE
> ordering, then
Hi Holger,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:47:57AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On Samstag, 13. September 2014, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I tested the patch in my local instance.
>
> yeah, it's clearly the wrong patch, I attached, sorry.
>
> > libspring-java as by now, migh
Hi Salvatore,
On Samstag, 13. September 2014, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I tested the patch in my local instance.
yeah, it's clearly the wrong patch, I attached, sorry.
> libspring-java as by now, might change in future, shows right now:
> This should be ordered (and for future releases):
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #742855 [security-tracker] security-tracker: tabular view should always be
by release order
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
742855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wi
Control: tags -1 - pending
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 01:32:38AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> commit baa7d44e460efe2b24e7b029633701cd29986d0d
> Author: Holger Levsen
> Date: Sat Sep 13 01:23:35 2014 +0200
>
> Sort releases correctly in tabular view. (Closes: #742855)
I tested
Hi,
commit baa7d44e460efe2b24e7b029633701cd29986d0d
Author: Holger Levsen
Date: Sat Sep 13 01:23:35 2014 +0200
Sort releases correctly in tabular view. (Closes: #742855)
diff --git a/lib/python/security_db.py b/lib/python/security_db.py
index 9a25ad6..8580d5b 100644
--- a/lib/python/secur
6 matches
Mail list logo
