On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 07:35:38PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Friday 9 November 2007 23:52, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Hi all again!
> >
> > DSA 1404-1 [1] claims that gallery2 version 2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 fixes
> > CVE-2007-4650 for etch.
> > The DSA page [2] seems to confirm this.
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:56:37 +0100 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
[...]
> I've corrected this now, it was due to a misunderstanding by myself of
> the tracker information.
Good, thanks.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian testing installation
Hi,
On Friday 9 November 2007 23:52, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi all again!
>
> DSA 1404-1 [1] claims that gallery2 version 2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 fixes
> CVE-2007-4650 for etch.
> The DSA page [2] seems to confirm this.
> However the CVE page [3] tells a different story: it states that version
> 2.1.2-2
Hi Thijs,
* Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-10 19:36]:
> On Friday 9 November 2007 23:52, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > DSA 1404-1 [1] claims that gallery2 version 2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 fixes
> > CVE-2007-4650 for etch.
> > The DSA page [2] seems to confirm this.
> > However the CVE page [3] te
Hi All,
On Friday 9 November 2007 23:52, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi all again!
>
> DSA 1404-1 [1] claims that gallery2 version 2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 fixes
> CVE-2007-4650 for etch.
> The DSA page [2] seems to confirm this.
> However the CVE page [3] tells a different story: it states that version
> 2.1
Hi all again!
DSA 1404-1 [1] claims that gallery2 version 2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 fixes
CVE-2007-4650 for etch.
The DSA page [2] seems to confirm this.
However the CVE page [3] tells a different story: it states that version
2.1.2-2.0.etch.1 is vulnerable.
Is this a security-tracker internal inconsistenc
6 matches
Mail list logo