Hi,
I cannot report a bug using neither reportbug nor bug.
The problem is that even I have set the EMAIL environment
or using the --email opt to set my from: line, the bug
message sent were still using my local not-FQDN hostname
hence got to be rejected by Debian's SMTP server. (only
that reportbu
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 09:19:05PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> I cannot report a bug using neither reportbug nor bug. The problem is that
> even I have set the EMAIL environment or using the --email opt to set my
> from: line, the bug message sent were still using my local not-FQDN
> hostname hence got
Anthony Fok wrote:
> (I wonder if you need to have a rewrite rule or something like
geez, i forgot that i could use such heavy metal method..
thanks anyways, ;)
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:52:46AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> Anthony Fok wrote:
> > (I wonder if you need to have a rewrite rule or something like
>
> geez, i forgot that i could use such heavy metal method..
> thanks anyways, ;)
Actually, it may not be so "heavy metal"... It is probably a common
Anthony Fok wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:52:46AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> > Anthony Fok wrote:
> > > (I wonder if you need to have a rewrite rule or something like
> >
> > geez, i forgot that i could use such heavy metal method..
> > thanks anyways, ;)
>
> Actually, it may not be so "heav
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:39:18AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
[ 上文： /etc/exim.conf 用 rewrite rule... ]
> Anthony Fok wrote:
> > Actually, it may not be so "heavy metal"... It is probably a common
> > setting used by many people. That's my speculation anyway. :-)
>
> Surely in the Debian community.. j
Anthony Fok wrote:
> 你没有用 mutt... 我相信你平时寄信一直用 Netscape，而
> 你的 Netscape 是配置为直接跟你 ISP 的 SMTP 服务器沟通，跟本
> 不经过你自己安装的 smail/sendmail/exim 处理，所以你平常寄信
> 才没有遇上问题。
Plus, my netscape talk with local MTA (Exim), not directly
to the outside SMTP server.
Anthony Fok wrote:
> 你没有用 mutt... 我相信你平时寄信一直用 Netscape，而
> 你的 Netscape 是配置为直接跟你 ISP 的 SMTP 服务器沟通，跟本
> 不经过你自己安装的 smail/sendmail/exim 处理，所以你平常寄信
> 才没有遇上问题。
I have extensive experience with Mutt and Gnus/XEmacs and quite
some other MUA/MTA. The question here is that I now WANT THINGS
SIMPLE. ;) Net
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:50:17PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> I have extensive experience with Mutt and Gnus/XEmacs and quite
> some other MUA/MTA. The question here is that I now WANT THINGS
> SIMPLE. ;)
我很赞同你的见解。的确，年多、两年前配置好系统，现在用得顺了，
忘记了当初配置时是如何的辛苦、头痛。可能以前头痛多了，现在懒得去想，
所以也尽量把痛苦淡忘。不错，为什么 Nets
>On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:50:17PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> 听说 KDE 的 KMail 和 GNOME 的 PAN、??? (Balsa??) 将会跟 Netscape、
>Outlook 等一样易用，我有个朋友就是这样，很简单的设置好 KMail 就可以用
>了，不必麻烦 sendmail、exim 等东西。但愿这些日子早日到来。
强烈推荐 kmail，真的是很好用！以拨接户而言，如果使用 sendmail
或 exim 的话，到时又得「伪造文书」，有点不方便。最重要的是，
它可以管理多个信箱。不过实在很占记忆体。:-(
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 05:29:06PM +0800, Edward Lee wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 05:50:17PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> > 听说 KDE 的 KMail 和 GNOME 的 PAN、??? (Balsa??) 将会跟 Netscape、
> >Outlook 等一样易用，我有个朋友就是这样，很简单的设置好 KMail 就可以用
> >了，不必麻烦 sendmail、exim 等东西。但愿这些日子早日到来。
>
> 强烈推荐 kmail，真的是很好用！以拨接户而言，如
Anthony Fok wrote:
> 其实 mutt 和 exim 合起来也相当不错，也可以管理多个信箱，
> 不过当初设定时不尽容易。
For your information:
Exim is good. ;) You don't have to edit exim.conf indeed,
instead edit /etc/email-address, then with the default
rewriting rule, you will get a much more flexible way to
solve the problem, just:
/etc/ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
