Re: gdb available

1997-04-09 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: : This means that we should, now, use "standard" Debian policy when : uploading our Debian packages? Yes. The hamm tree has been seeded with the current state of the Sparc port, and there are enough Alpha files in the hamm tree to really frustrate anyone

Re: gdb available

1997-04-09 Thread Davide Barbieri
Bdale Garbee wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > : It is version 4.16-6, and not 4.16-1 because I have first > : tried to compile the original package for i386 debian, > : then modified it when necessary (almost applying RedHat patches). > > The policy says that a non-maintainer r

Re: gdb available

1997-04-09 Thread Bdale Garbee
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: : : It is version 4.16-6, and not 4.16-1 because I have first : tried to compile the original package for i386 debian, : then modified it when necessary (almost applying RedHat patches). : The policy says that a non-maintainer release should keep the exi

gdb available

1997-04-09 Thread Davide Barbieri
Hi, while I'm still trying to understand what is (or could be) wrong in my gcc package, I made a gdb package for debian sparc. It is available via anonymous ftp on test.dei.unipd.it:/pub/debian It is version 4.16-6, and not 4.16-1 because I have first tried to compile the original packag