Re: silo problem

1998-02-18 Thread Tom Dyas
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Davide Barbieri wrote: > > 1) Modify the Makefile so the second stage bootloader no longer links with > > libc. Obviously, the userlevel "silo" utility needs to link with libc as > > usual. > > And how I can do this? silo is linked to libc, because it lacks a lot > of func

Re: LIBC 6 changes

1998-02-18 Thread Juan Cespedes
On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 12:42:00PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > Dear Debian SPARC developers, > > Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the head GNU LIBC developer. > He would like to be kept in the loop when you make changes to LIBC. > Please make sure to send him patches, etc. Hi. I'm th

Re: silo problem

1998-02-18 Thread Elie Rosenblum
And thus spake Davide Barbieri, on Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 08:24:43AM +0100: > I'm not confident that I will able to do it :-) > > I had already try that way, but silo lacks these functions: > str* > mem* > ext2* > udiv, umul, urem and probably others... If you require having glibc around to build,

Re: silo problem

1998-02-18 Thread Andreas Jaeger
> Davide Barbieri writes: Davide> Tom Dyas wrote: >> >I'm still trying to have a silo working with glibc. >> > >> > I had some problems, with some assembler code. >> > >> > There is a file, called jmp.S which defines the symbol >> > __setjmp, which is also defined in /usr/lib/libc.a >> >

Re: silo problem

1998-02-18 Thread Davide Barbieri
Tom Dyas wrote: > >I'm still trying to have a silo working with glibc. > > > > I had some problems, with some assembler code. > > > > There is a file, called jmp.S which defines the symbol > > __setjmp, which is also defined in /usr/lib/libc.a > > > > So, when it is time to link silo