According to Alexander Schulz:
> it also oopses without the patch, so it is probably some other problem.
> Anyone knowing this?
It works with 2.0.30. Perhaps someone with a newer installation should test
the patch, for my clib and stuff is quite old. Other than that, I have no
idea at the moment.
According to Alexander Schulz:
> Perhaps I am doing something wrong here, or it is the experimental
> audio-support? I did not have those Problems with the 2.0.30
> I will try to recompile the 2.0.35 without the patch and see if that works
> better with audio.
it also oopses without the patch, so
Hello
there are some problems with the patch, I think. First, I could not load the
audio module, but later this worked without me doing anything diffrent. It
seems to have some trouble swapping out things as I need memory for kmalloc.
It just gave me an oops as I tried to cat something to the audi
--On Sat, Nov 28, 1998 1:25 pm -0500 "Steve Dunham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Jules Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> --On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 10:08 pm +0100 "Eric Delaunay"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > About kernel, I will release the next bootdisks with 2.0.35. Is it
enough
Hello,
I found the patch on my harddisk. It was a patch against 2.0.21 which I am
using with a 2.0.30 kernel for half a year now. I tried to apply it to a
2.0.35-sparc kernel, which worked partly. I changed 2 hunks that where not
found in the new kernel (they just changed some indentation and thin
According to Eric Delaunay:
>
> Well, nfsroot installation is working :-))
Thank yo very much!
> PPS: actually there is no way to enable swap on diskless workstation. I
>remember I heard a long time ago about swap-on-nfs patch for linux. Is it
>still available somewhere ? Could it be
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:40:41AM +, James Troup wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ben Collins writes:
> > > Some one said recently they would post a list of the packages that
> > > wouldn't auto compile for sparc from slink. Is this still going to be
> > > posted, I'd like to help g
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:31:35AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 7:04 pm -0500 "Ben Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 11:01:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to see wanna-build and its friends managing this process
> >
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 12:54:21PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Some one said recently they would post a list of the packages that
> wouldn't auto compile for sparc from slink. Is this still going to be
> posted, I'd like to help getting these things compiled.
I said I'll post one and I'll do soon.
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Stephan Wiehr wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Since I'm quite new to Debian on Sparc here's a question:
>
> after installing libc6 2.0.95-980825 on a Sparc 1 (yes, sun4c) I keep
> getting 'Unimplemented SPARC system call' 103 and 119
> I'm just wondering if this is k
On Sat, Nov 28, 1998 at 05:09:46PM -0800, Paul Vojta wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 1998 12:59:09 -0500 (EST),
> "J. S. Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ldd reports:
> >
> > libdb.so.3 => /lib/libdb.so.3 (0x5002c000)
> > libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x50084000)
> > libnsl.so.1
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 12:44:03AM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote:
> PS: the kernel in kernel-image-2.1.125 is not compiled with NFSROOT, BOOTP &
>RARP options as the 2.0.35 did. Theses options are required for diskless
>workstations & low memory installation (where the root image cannot fit
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:04:12AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > which kernel will we use as standard kernel ?
> > 2.0.35 is pretty stable for me but it's not completely stable because the
> > virtual consoles die sometimes. 2.1.125 is much better but it has got the
> > X logout crash probl
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, yes 1.4.0.31 is the latest slink. I just noticed our problem is
> the convergence of slink binary-sparc packages and potato binary-all
> packages (dpkg-dev is 1.4.1 in potato/main/binary-sparc/base). This
> should really be resolved before we can real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Collins writes:
> > Some one said recently they would post a list of the packages that
> > wouldn't auto compile for sparc from slink. Is this still going to be
> > posted, I'd like to help getting these things compiled.
>
> I would like to see wanna-build and it
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:31:35AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> This was my point, of course. That's why we need a freeze.
How do we go about getting a freeze?
--
--- - - --- - - - ---
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian G
--On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 7:04 pm -0500 "Ben Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 11:01:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I would like to see wanna-build and its friends managing this process
>> (since it produces such a list, facilitates autocompiles of packages
>
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 11:01:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would like to see wanna-build and its friends managing this process
> (since it produces such a list, facilitates autocompiles of packages
> that do compile, e.g. those out of date, allows builders to submit
> reasons why it
18 matches
Mail list logo
