On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:24:55PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> I said earlier in the week:
>
> >> I've just started doing a new set of official sparc images on
> >> cdimage.debian.org and things are failing all over the place. I've checked
> >> up and the binary-sparc directories are full of
Hallo,
I installed Debian/Sparc on an ultra 5. Since I want to use the
solaris-emulation I have to recompile the kernel this solris-emul on. The
stock slink kernel-image is lacking this.
Compiling a kernel failed with this:
atyfb.c: In function `atyfb_ioctl':
atyfb.c:2213: `FBTYPE_PCI_GENERIC' un
Hi...
> Kernel-source 2.2.9 or 2.2.10. I guess it compiles sparc and not sparc64
> but how to change this.
No clue about this :-( Maybe somebody can help...?
> I also tried to create a tftpboot from the potato kernel-image but I'm not
> able to make it ;-(.
Your Sun can only boot from an A
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I said earlier in the week:
>
> >> I've just started doing a new set of official sparc images on
> >> cdimage.debian.org and things are failing all over the place. I've checked
> >> up and the binary-sparc directories are full of sym-links to sid. Can
Hi,
What must I do to get help??? Over the past months I
have posted the following question to this group; I have even
emailed prominant 'debians' in this group yet not a word of help
from any one!
So here goes again:
Please send me a 'handshake' so I know this gets to the list.
I am no
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:48:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running the last stable release of slink, 2.0.35 kernel
> on a Sun IPX Sparc. It is wonderful As is apt which, BTW,
> works flawlessly and is a huge improvement over the original
> dselect of earlier releases. In fac
Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
> Your Sun can only boot from an A.OUT image- however, the kernel image is
> ELF binary format. (Also, this will be the format of every kernel you
> compile youself.) You may "check" this (in a rather sloppy way) by
> issuing a
> file
> Result will be "ELF binary".
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A couple of questions appeared in my mind while upgrading to 2.2.10:
> (1) This business of having to install /etc/init.d/devpts.sh from
> potato's libc6 to make a recent 2.2.x kernel work if
> CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS is selected. It's not too hard to do by hand, but
> it d
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've managed to get setserial 2.15-4 to compile (see the important bug
> I filed with a patch), however, I get the following errors when
> running it...
> # setserial /dev/ttyS0
> sys32_ioctl: Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(541e) arg(ec20)
> Cannot get
>I always assumed it wasn't needed (and disabled it). The error
>message that you included above will only come from the sparc64
>kernel. (It is from the code in
>arch/sparc64/kernel/{ioctl,sys_sparc32}.c which translates the
>arguments of 32-bit system calls into 64-bit system calls.)
Is it th
I said earlier in the week:
>> I've just started doing a new set of official sparc images on
>> cdimage.debian.org and things are failing all over the place. I've checked
>> up and the binary-sparc directories are full of sym-links to sid. Can
>> somebody please explain this? At the moment this m
11 matches
Mail list logo