Re: Bug#50012: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc

1999-11-12 Thread Yann Dirson
Eric Delaunay writes: > Since the compiled program does not work like expected, it could be a > compilation problem. Could be because sparc macro is not define anymore ? Surely a change in what gets defined could explain such things. What should be tested for instead ? This does not seem to h

Packages.gz and gnome

1999-11-12 Thread Leonardo Rochael Almeida
Hi, I'm thinking about grabing all October gnome debian sources for slink and compiling it on my SPARCstation 4 (which will probably take a relatively small number of years). After that I intend on adding a line to my /etc/apt/sources.list pointing to the location of the packages. So here are my

console-tools really out-of-date

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Hello, the console-tools package in potato is still the one from slink. I don't know why it was not recompiled. Might be because of a change in numbering that now uses epoch. Or is there some other issues I'm not aware of? Regards. -- Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'e

Re: working modutils ? where ?

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 04:38:31PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > > > Hello dear developers, > > > > I heard that the latest modutils are not working well on both sparc32 & > > sparc64. I'm working on boot-floppies now and, when I try to configure the > > drivers, I get "

kbd: reload i386 default keymap instead of sun default keymap on sparc

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Package: kbd Version: 0.99-5 Architecture: sparc Apply the following patch to compile on sparc because the sparc macro is not defined anymore by the compiler :( Thanks in advance. --- paths.h~Fri Nov 12 19:06:27 1999 +++ paths.h Fri Nov 12 19:35:03 1999 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ /* * Default

Re: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Paul Vojta wrote: > > Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:18:11 +0100 (CET) > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian bug tracking system), > > debian-sparc@lists.debian.org (debian sparc group) > > From: Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc > > > > Latest mke2fs zeroe

Re: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc

1999-11-12 Thread Paul Vojta
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:18:11 +0100 (CET) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian bug tracking system), > debian-sparc@lists.debian.org (debian sparc group) > From: Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: bad mke2fs behavior on sparc > > Latest mke2fs zeroes the first sector of the partit

Re: working modutils ? where ?

1999-11-12 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 04:38:31PM +0100, Eric Delaunay wrote: > > Hello dear developers, > > I heard that the latest modutils are not working well on both sparc32 & > sparc64. I'm working on boot-floppies now and, when I try to configure the > drivers, I get "ELF file not for this architectur

working modutils ? where ?

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Hello dear developers, I heard that the latest modutils are not working well on both sparc32 & sparc64. I'm working on boot-floppies now and, when I try to configure the drivers, I get "ELF file not for this architecture" error during depmod. I'm currently running 2.3.6-6.1 on SparcClassic but

bad mke2fs behavior on sparc

1999-11-12 Thread Eric Delaunay
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.17-1 Architecture: sparc Severity: critical Latest mke2fs zeroes the first sector of the partition is is formating. It is really bad on sparc when the partition starts at sector 0 because it kills the partition table :(( I took a quick look into e2fsprogs sources: it