Hi all, first of all, let me apologize for asking this on the list when
I'm quite sure that the answer can be foundin the archives...
Unfortunately, the archives seem to be broken right now (the ones on
lists.debian.org, anyway). So, here I go anyway!
I'm trying to tftp boot a sparc 2. I've got
Hi ppl,
Here's another wrongly compiled package.
- Forwarded message from Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#60871: exim_3.12-6.deb depends on libdb1.85, a non-existent package
Reply-To: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-D
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Well, I finally got ahold of a sparc 1+ sun4c to test the floppy boot
> > images, and to my dismay, they worked perfectly (both the sun4c and
Ben et. al.,
FWIW, I have a stack of 9 Sparc 1+ machines in the office (I think
all but one will a
System Admin wrote:
> I installed frozen from floppy on an IPX last night and tried to use
> the
> automatic configuration using dhcp as I am on a cable modem system and dhcp
> is
> their prefered method I use dhcp when I am running Solaris. dhcp failed and I
> tried to configure the net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>I just download the file rescue.bin from the debian-sparc potato
> distribution and try to install a linux potato system on ma sun IPX (I
> take it from the directory sun3cdm/images-1.44). What happens it that
> it would go as far as trying to load the
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Hermano Cabral wrote:
> I just installed potato in a sparc 1+ here, and I had the problem that
> exim_3.12-6 was depending on libdb1.85, which doesn't exist, and
> therefore didn't want to install. libdb1, on the other hand, is alive
> and well. I sent a b
I just installed potato in a sparc 1+ here, and I had the problem that
exim_3.12-6 was depending on libdb1.85, which doesn't exist, and
therefore didn't want to install. libdb1, on the other hand, is alive
and well. I sent a bug report to the maintainer but he said his version
didn't depend at all
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> Well, I finally got ahold of a sparc 1+ sun4c to test the floppy boot
> images, and to my dismay, they worked perfectly (both the sun4c and
> sun4cdm). Now, this isn't to say that something isn't wrong, just that I
> couldn't reproduce the problems that qu
Well, I finally got ahold of a sparc 1+ sun4c to test the floppy boot
images, and to my dismay, they worked perfectly (both the sun4c and
sun4cdm). Now, this isn't to say that something isn't wrong, just that I
couldn't reproduce the problems that quite a few others have had.
Question, what did ev
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 02:16:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>I just download the file rescue.bin from the debian-sparc potato
> distribution and try to install a linux potato system on ma sun IPX (I
> take it from the directory sun3cdm/images-1.44). What happens it that
Hi everybody!
I read through the archive of this mailing list and found a couple of
mails concerning the installation of Debian on a SS5/170. People seem to
have problems, but in principle I read from those mails that they were
able to install it and have a running system?!
Well, to make it short
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Matthew Haas wrote:
> Good morning.
>
> Just inquiring into the current status of Tadpole's SPARCbook 3GX under
> Debian... I will be getting one in the near future and am looking into the
>
...
> Does anyone have one of these machines, and what is their level of
> succes
Good morning.
Just inquiring into the current status of Tadpole's SPARCbook 3GX under
Debian... I will be getting one in the near future and am looking into the
OS to put on it... I'd like to put Linux on it, but I've heard reports of
varying levels of support.
Does anyone have one of these m
Hi,
I just download the file rescue.bin from the debian-sparc potato
distribution and try to install a linux potato system on ma sun IPX (I
take it from the directory sun3cdm/images-1.44). What happens it that
it would go as far as trying to load the system then display the
message
R
> I've seen problems that I have avoided by backing out my second
> processor.
>
> Machine: sparc-20
> OS: 2.2.14
> CPUs: 2
>
> Using the sparc as for NAT to other machines. When it had
> both eth0 (10MB/s) and eth1 (adsl+pppoe) going good, pppoe
> would say that it found a bad checksum, and
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 06:59:02PM -0500, eric wrote:
> I've seen problems that I have avoided by backing out my second
> processor.
>
> Machine: sparc-20
> OS: 2.2.14
> CPUs: 2
>
> Using the sparc as for NAT to other machines. When it had
> both eth0 (10MB/s) and eth1 (adsl+pppoe) going good,
I installed frozen from floppy on an IPX last night and tried to use
the
automatic configuration using dhcp as I am on a cable modem system and dhcp is
their prefered method I use dhcp when I am running Solaris. dhcp failed and I
tried to configure the network from what I know of the co
I've seen problems that I have avoided by backing out my second
processor.
Machine: sparc-20
OS: 2.2.14
CPUs: 2
Using the sparc as for NAT to other machines. When it had
both eth0 (10MB/s) and eth1 (adsl+pppoe) going good, pppoe
would say that it found a bad checksum, and drop the line.
At the
18 matches
Mail list logo
