On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 01:36:29PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:11:25PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:12:11AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > >
> > > > has someone built the binaries (or even an installer package) for the
> > > > gnome-helix
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:11:25PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:12:11AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> >
> > > has someone built the binaries (or even an installer package) for the
> > > gnome-helix release?
> >
> > I'd be prepared to work on this.
> >
> > Ben: How
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:12:11AM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > has someone built the binaries (or even an installer package) for the
> > gnome-helix release?
>
> I'd be prepared to work on this.
>
> Ben: How is woody? Is the debian sparc unstable autobuilder up and running?
Woody's g
> has someone built the binaries (or even an installer package) for the
> gnome-helix release?
I'd be prepared to work on this.
Ben: How is woody? Is the debian sparc unstable autobuilder up and running?
Anton
>
> >>gnome-panel depends on gnome-panel-data (>= 1.0.55-2.0.1)
> >>gnome-help depends on gnome-help-data (>= 1.0.55-2.0.1)
>
> >>The available version of both gnome-panel-data and gnome-help-data
> >>is 1.0.55-2.
>
> been taken into consideration for the next release after the CDa release?
Fil
Hello SPARC friends,
has someone built the binaries (or even an installer package) for the
gnome-helix release? Would be great if I do not need to spend hours (maybe
days ;-)) ) trying to download and getting it running. Has the misbehaviour
that was mentioned by Erik Mouw ->
>>I just upgraded my
Hello SPARC friends,
I am trying to get my U10 with its Creator card to switch automagically at
boot into the fine 132xXX resolution my SPARC 5 does after a clean
installation of D2.2. When I installed the new release everything had that
nice resolution from the beginning, but with my U10 I have t
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 02:57:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Why should such info be coded into an image file format (even as a side
> effect)? It has nothing to do with representing the image! Part of the
> problem is my ignorance of the .ras file format. Is it basically just a
> memory
Hi,
Well, after renaming the offending xbanner, X starts up
:-)[1]; only problem is, the mouse doesn't work. When the system
starts up, I get the message:
Sun Mouse-Systems mouse driver version 1.00
Which I think (from drivers/sbus/char/sunmouse.c) means that it found
the mouse OK.
Now
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 08:24:47PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:29:55PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:24:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Hr. Does anyone know anything about the .ras file format? I suppose
[...]
> > >
10 matches
Mail list logo
