The PC532 port of NetBSD has a driver for this device, or at least one like
it. Not exactly on target, but if you are up to doing it yourself, that
will show you generally how to do it.
Ken
Kelsey Jordahl writes:
I have an old Asante SCSI ethernet adapter that I would like to use as
a s
Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mandi! Philippe Troin
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > 1. When the machine is at runlevel 2, I can start minicom, login via
> > the serial console. If I close minicom without logging off, my
> > session stays pending there, waiting for t
I have an old Asante SCSI ethernet adapter that I would like to use as
a second ethernet connector with a Sparc 5. Can anyone confirm or
deny that this adapter will work with a Linux Sparc? Will it be able
to autodetect the ethernet chip through the SCSI interface, so it is
just a matter of whet
Hi All,
Hope all is going well!
Is anyone out there using Sparc Debian on a Sun Enterprise 250 ?
I'd be really interested in hearing any information about such a
machine with Sparc Debian installed on it. ie. success stories,
problems, performance against
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> > This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> > these things being built and by who?
>
> Ok, who do I kill.. the stable chroot on vore is running *unstable*.
> That sucks!
Please read the g77 manual and its references about floating point and
IEEE arithmetic conformance. It even had physicist input --
computational scientists need to understand the issues.
Please don't follow up to all these lists. I doubt debian-sparc,
where I'm reading it, cares.
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> > This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> > these things being built and by who?
>
> Ok, who do I kill.. the stable chroot on vore is running *unstable*.
> That sucks!
Well.. I would have pointed to BenC, but
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:50:34AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
> Ionut Georgescu wrote:
>
> > PS command line: g77 -g -pg -o programm *.f
> > PPS gcc -v:
> > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.3/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (Debian release)
>
> I'm interested... I
Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> PS command line: g77 -g -pg -o programm *.f
> PPS gcc -v:
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.3/specs
> gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (Debian release)
I'm interested... I don't know enough FORTRAN to test this out, but I have been
seeing Scilab (w
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> these things being built and by who?
Ok, who do I kill.. the stable chroot on vore is running *unstable*.
That sucks!
Wichert.
--
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> these things being built and by who?
By me on vore in the stable chroot generally. Unfortunately I can't
use the rbuilder since Jason is refusing to put an anonymous FTP upload
reas somewhere and
The purpose is to compute the following expression:
enfer= 1.3058750148074976d0
entmp = 0.093822912209640966d0
enpct = -2.2021424321973448d0
tfermi = 1.0d0/(dexp((enpct-enfer)/entmp)+1.0d0)
The problem is the following. With a small test programm, the result is
a
Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Thu 19 Apr 2001, Julian Stoev wrote:
> >
> > smbclient depends on libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2); however:
> > Version of libc6 on system is 2.1.3-18.
>
> Confirmed, these packages were clearly built on an unstable system,
> not potato.
>
> I recommend pulling them ASAP from sec
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:57:39PM +0900, Julian Stoev wrote:
> Hi!
> I saw the announcement [SECURITY] [DSA-048-1] samba symlink attacks
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-01/msg00047.html
> and because apt-get was not updating, I downloded the SPARC packages
> and did dpkg -i on
On Thu 19 Apr 2001, Julian Stoev wrote:
>
> smbclient depends on libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2); however:
> Version of libc6 on system is 2.1.3-18.
Confirmed, these packages were clearly built on an unstable system,
not potato.
I recommend pulling them ASAP from security.d.o .
Paul Slootman
--
home:
Hi!
I saw the announcement [SECURITY] [DSA-048-1] samba symlink attacks
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-01/msg00047.html
and because apt-get was not updating, I downloded the SPARC packages
and did dpkg -i on them
The result is here:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configurati
16 matches
Mail list logo
