On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:18:19PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> > 99.% of the things done to the machines are not posted to
> > debian-devel-announce :P
>
> 99.$ of the things done to machines don't affect the average
> user of the machine.
You mean thi
Andrew Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philippe Troin wrote:
> >
> > Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Mandi! Philippe Troin
> > > In chel di` si favelave...
> > >
> > > > 1. When the machine is at runlevel 2, I can start minicom, login via
> > > > the serial conso
Philippe Troin wrote:
>
> Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Mandi! Philippe Troin
> > In chel di` si favelave...
> >
> > > 1. When the machine is at runlevel 2, I can start minicom, login via
> > > the serial console. If I close minicom without logging off, my
> > > se
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> 99.% of the things done to the machines are not posted to
> debian-devel-announce :P
99.$ of the things done to machines don't affect the average
user of the machine.
Wichert.
--
/ Gener
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:05:59PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> > Yeah, it was broken once. Wichert just didn't pay attention to vore's
> > motd, so he didn't know how to access it properly. Also note, that the
> > only thing on auric that is from unstable is tet
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Yeah, it was broken once. Wichert just didn't pay attention to vore's
> motd, so he didn't know how to access it properly. Also note, that the
> only thing on auric that is from unstable is tetex.
Bah, I just don't consider the motd a good place for announcements
li
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also note, that the only thing on auric that is from unstable is
> tetex.
Err, and postgresql and apt...
--
James
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:51:25PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> > No, I knew about the new method. But there was something else screwed up
> > (no passwd info or somesuch) so dpkg-buildpackage was barfing.
>
> Wasn't that voltaire? But yes, there is a problem
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:26:52PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> > Well, where should we be building them? I recall that the last time I
> > was trying to build one, vore's chroot was broken and you said to build
> > them on auric.
>
> Turns out there is a work
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 09:22:46AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:05:46AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> > these things being built and by who?
>
> Well, where should we be building them? I recall that t
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> No, I knew about the new method. But there was something else screwed up
> (no passwd info or somesuch) so dpkg-buildpackage was barfing.
Wasn't that voltaire? But yes, there is a problem with the userdir-ldap
setup: it can't handle having different db formats for
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:26:52PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Turns out there is a working chroot on vore but you now need a diferent
> method to access it. Ben just never announced that changed and only
> put it in the motd, which I never saw since I use .hushlogin everywhere.
No, I knew ab
Previously Michael Stone wrote:
> Well, where should we be building them? I recall that the last time I
> was trying to build one, vore's chroot was broken and you said to build
> them on auric.
Turns out there is a working chroot on vore but you now need a diferent
method to access it. Ben just n
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:05:46AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> This is a growing problem with security updates on sparc. Where are
> these things being built and by who?
Well, where should we be building them? I recall that the last time I
was trying to build one, vore's chroot was broken and you
neo:~# apt-get -d dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back
gnupg w3m-ssl
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
I think that some other packages have brok
15 matches
Mail list logo
