Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Sven wrote: > BVut aren't the build daemons supposed to fill a bug if this is the case, at > least that is what the m68k autobuilders dom and also the sparc one, i think, > at least i received lmails from them in the past. uh, the mechanism is like th

Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread James Troup
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BVut aren't the build daemons supposed to fill a bug if this is the > case, at least that is what the m68k autobuilders dom and also the > sparc one, i think, at least i received lmails from them in the > past. build daemons don't file bugs, humans do. overwork

Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:36:36PM +0100, Sven wrote: > Should i redo a package (lablgl-0.95-3) and have all the subarches rebuild > just because sparc and maybe arm did build the package with the wrong version > of ocaml ? maybe you need versioned build-depends? or something similar and look

Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Sven
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote: > > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough > > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or > > sparc, an

Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Sven
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote: > > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough > > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or > > sparc, an

Re: lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Sven wrote: > I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough > uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or > sparc, and thus there is no version of lablgtk in woody. uh, check buildd.debian.org

lablgtk package not built ?

2001-11-02 Thread Sven
Hello, ... I am the maintainer of, under others, the lablgtk package, which altough uploaded to unstable on september the 24, is not yet built on either arm or sparc, and thus there is no version of lablgtk in woody. Is there a reason for lablgtk not being available on arm or sparc ? If so, it wo