On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 19:20, Gordon Cormack wrote:
> Hullo.
>
> Yes I know I'm crazy trying to install Deb on an e250 but hey, why not
> (anyone else tried to)?
yes, and it works great...I have it working on a 2P e250 w/ internal
scsi disk.
> Anyways, can seem to be able to boot. Works fine on
Hullo.
Yes I know I'm crazy
trying to install Deb on an e250 but hey, why not (anyone else tried
to)?
Anyways, can seem to
be able to boot. Works fine on all the other Ultra10's
though.
It goes through
SILO, remaps the kernel, starts to load linux but then kernel
panics...
I've
tr
I've actually got a (PCI) weasel - it's more useful for (1) kernel
development (2) non-sighted (or simply remote!) access to BIOS
settings. It's not nearly as interesting for service oriented
hardware, which you hardly ever reboot, and only need to see the BIOS
when you're right there changing har
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:07:09PM +0100, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> > > > And just the benefit of being able to run headless with a
> > > > real serial port console (i.e. including being able to get to the
> > > > "BIOS") is enough benefit over Intel stuff for me. (I keep hoping
> > > > that some
Title: â§â¡â
"íë¼ìëì¬" ê°ë¼ì¬ë...
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 19:28, Christian Jönsson wrote:
> This thread is also forwarded to the debian sparc list.
>
> The problem is that the boehm garbage collector (gc) test in the
> gcc-3.1 test suite fails on (Debian woody) sparc-linux. It might be
> binutils problem, it might be a gcc pr
unsubscribe
> > > And just the benefit of being able to run headless with a
> > > real serial port console (i.e. including being able to get to the
> > > "BIOS") is enough benefit over Intel stuff for me. (I keep hoping
> > > that someone will start shipping Intel boards with the Linux BIOS
> > > Project ROM
Does anybody know if a SUN 370-1704 X1062A Differential SCSI SBus card
will work with Linux (in an SS20)?
Thanks
--
From: Ed Schaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sun Support for Linux
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:46:51 -0700
> > > And just the benefit of being able to run headless with a
> > > real serial port console (i.e. including being able to get to the
> > > "BIOS") is enough benefit over Intel stuff fo
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone?
> > >
> > > Which Xs have you tried?
> >
> > 4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endiane
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
> > >
> > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone?
> >
> > Which Xs have you tried?
>
> 4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endianess, 3.3.6 works
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
> >
> > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone?
>
> Which Xs have you tried?
4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endianess, 3.3.6 works ok, but
the RedHat 3.3.6 I used does an mmap on /dev/fb, not /proc/bus/pci/XX
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote:
>
> This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone?
Which Xs have you tried?
--
John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune:
Look before you leap.
-- Samuel Butler
Hi,
I have an ATI mach64 VT about which Linux says:
atyfb: mach64VTA4 (ATI264VT) [0x5654 rev 0x40] 2M SDRAM, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 200
MHz PLL, 67 MHz MCLK
This card seems not to do any byte swapping whatever the settings for
the apertures in the MEM_CNTL register are.
Does anyone have any docume
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.19
Severity: important
Okay, this is going to be the bug report then.
(When replying to this message on the list for some reason, please don't
forget to REMOVE the Cc to submit!)
Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@14 Feb 2002 00:08:03 -0500:
> > I tried 3.0.19 on my x86
16 matches
Mail list logo
