From: "IvanK." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:12:10 -0400
I've compiled many times 2.4.19 with 3.1 cross-compiled for sparc64-linux
and
so far had had no problem (except not being able to compile framebuffer
support).
Should I continue using it (if it ain'
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:18:58PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks.
> > >
> > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml
> > > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded w
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks.
> >
> > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml
> > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to
> > rebuild the packages ?
>
>
> Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks.
>
> BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml
> sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to
> rebuild the packages ?
Nope, that would be James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Ryan
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:12:43AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > Hello, ...
> > > >
> > > > I wante
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > Hello, ...
> > >
> > > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only
> > > thing
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only
> > thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it)
> > fr
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only
> thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it)
> from entering testing.
>
> The package was built by the sparc buildd on s
Is there a sid box available, or alternatively could a sid chroot be
made available somewhere, so that people can look at their packages on
sparc ?
Would it have to be sparc64, or would a simple sparc32 suffice?
If I can get my E3000 to work, you can have access to that one
- if not, I have a S
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Ben Collins mentioned:
> > It seems to be a package bug - same thing happened me, and now I can't
> > update...I assume the solution is to remove gcc, and wait for a fixed gcc
> > package ?
> apt-get remove libc6-sparc64
Of course, that gcc depends on i
Hello, ...
I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only
thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it)
from entering testing.
The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not
uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64
12 matches
Mail list logo
