Re: libc6-sparc64 / testing

2003-06-16 Thread Philippe Sainte-Marie
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:59:38 -0400, Ben Collins wrote: On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:37:53PM +0200, Philippe Sainte-Marie wrote: Hi. I'm having troubles while upgrading my debian from stable to testing: apt-get remove libc6-sparc64 apt-get upgrade apt-get install libc6-sparc64 Here is

install prob MAGIC NUMBER WRONG

2003-06-16 Thread Stefan Kiczerjak
Hi list, i want to install woody on a sparc station. i have used the s key in fsdisk to create a Sun disk label, but unfortunately the machine hangs at boottime with following error message: BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG if have tried all block-numbers i have got from: #newfs -N

Kernel 2.4.21 does not work on my SS20

2003-06-16 Thread Erwan MAS
Hello , I have a SS20 with 2xROSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I boot on the kernel. the kernel detect all the hardware . I see the line Freeing unused kernel memory: 176k freed . But after nothing . I haved boot with kerenl argument console=ttya . One time the system haved boot on kernel 2.4.21 (

Re: install prob MAGIC NUMBER WRONG

2003-06-16 Thread John O'Connor
You may need to boot up off a Sun CD and run format. At least this is a problem I have seen installing Sun Solaris on new or non-Sun disks. John O'Connor - Original Message - From: Stefan Kiczerjak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Sent:

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote: I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2 packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and egcs64. Thus I tried this hint,

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote: I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2 packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. I failed compiling a working kernel fpr

Re: libc6-sparc64 / testing

2003-06-16 Thread Ben Collins
Unpacking replacement libc6-sparc64 ... You didn't remove libc6-sparc64 then. It says replacement, and that it is still trying to upgrade it. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo -

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Elie De Brauwer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 June 2003 15:42, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote: I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2 packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. I

CDrom boot problem with a sparcstation10

2003-06-16 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Hello, I am new to the sparc architecture, so maybe my question is a newbie question. I am currently trying to install Debian Woody on my SparcStation10 (with two processors). I downloaded the isos (a while ago, it is not a 3.0r1) and entered boot prompt (boot prom ?) : #0 ok boot cdrom Note

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote: I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and egcs64. Thus I tried this hint, but it also fails with the messages printed in the end of this mail. It is the same as I reported in this list with subject Some issues

Accessing hardware

2003-06-16 Thread Elie De Brauwer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a little question, suppose I want to write a program capable of reading out the temperature on the temperature sensor, or accessing other pieces of information the system might contain, I can acces some information mount the openpromfs, but I

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 does not work on my SS20

2003-06-16 Thread Emanuel Schmid
hello i think there are some other that have the same problem. i assume you had a 2.2.x running until now. if not, the following probably isn't true. i have a dual hypersparc at 125mhz with 1meg cache (511-6326). this one runs fine without smp. if i try to start a smp-kernel, the usability

RE: Kernel 2.4.21 does not work on my SS20

2003-06-16 Thread Nicolas Will
Got the same problem here... The machine randonly hangs at the INIT stage during boot. INIT seems to be shaky on Woody stable for Sparc, as it really doesn;t like respawning processes too quickly (I had the problem with the virtual consoles when booting without keyboard). Once the machine

Re: Accessing hardware

2003-06-16 Thread Eric Brower
Which system type, Elie? E Elie De Brauwer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a little question, suppose I want to write a program capable of reading out the temperature on the temperature sensor, or accessing other pieces of information the system might contain, I

Re: libc6-sparc64 / testing

2003-06-16 Thread Philippe Sainte-Marie
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:55:15 -0400, Ben Collins wrote: Unpacking replacement libc6-sparc64 ... You didn't remove libc6-sparc64 then. It says replacement, and that it is still trying to upgrade it. After an apt-get remove --purge libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6-sparc64, an apt-get update, apt-get -u

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Kenneth Johansson
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote: I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun Blade 100, installed from the first time, loaded perfectly after reboot after following the threads the past few days i think it has to be said that the kernel

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-16 Thread Eloy A. Paris
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:31:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: This is very confusing. What version of gcc shoud I be using to compile kernels on the Sparc? You can uninstall gcc-3.3. You compiled with the right version. I suspect you did something wrong though. Try my

Give it a try for me please!

2003-06-16 Thread Caleb Duffy
v align="center"> -mq9lbdzw6to- get larger nuts and penis, more pleasure, more satisfaction More Info Here! Original Message debian-sparc@lists.debian.org wrote: > Can this be true?