Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-17 Thread Elie De Brauwer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 June 2003 19:33, Kenneth Johansson wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote: I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun Blade 100, installed from the first time, loaded perfectly after

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-17 Thread Kenneth Johansson
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:19, Elie De Brauwer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 16 June 2003 19:33, Kenneth Johansson wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 16:58, Elie De Brauwer wrote: I little quick response, the 2.4.21 package works perfectly on my Sun Blade 100,

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-17 Thread Herbert Xu
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: personal problem is solved. This does not solve the problem that kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u(from stable) kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 (from unstable) throw these errors and I really have no idea what might cause this trouble. Make

Linking error with vsftpd

2003-06-17 Thread David List
I'm trying to install vsftpd, and I have downloaded version 1.2.0. I am aware that vsftpd is on the Debian 3.0_r1 installation media, but that's in version 1.0. When try issuing 'make' in vsftpd's source directory, I end up with this: gcc -c sysutil.c -O2 -Wall -W -Wshadow -idirafter dummyinc

Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Chuck Brown
I'm somewhat familiar with linux (via RedHat). I'm completely unfamiliar with sparc. And I have access to a Sparc Ultra 60 that I would like to load Debian onto. I've tried searching the web and the mailing list archives but I haven't found an answer to my problem (hopefully the answer

Re: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
Sun Ultra 60 UPA/PCI (2 X UltraSPARC-II 360MHz), Keyboard Present OpenBoot 3.23, 1024 MB memory installed, Serial #. Ethernet address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx, Host ID: . Rebooting with command: boot cdrom Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL

Jigdo fails for disks 7 and 8 of 'testing' distribution

2003-06-17 Thread Neil Fowler Wright
Hi, I must say I am generally impressed with the Jigdo program and it's usefulness for downloading iso's. However I have encountered a few problems with disks 7 and 8 of the testing distribution of debian-sparc. They fail for 4 and 2 files respectively, repeatedly, for the server;

Re: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:41:26PM -0500, Chuck Brown wrote: Thank you. I perform a probe-scsi and receive the following: {0} ok probe-scsi Target 0 Unit 0Disk FUJITSU MAJ3182M SUN18G 0804 Target 6 Unit 0Removable Read Only device TOSHIBA XM6201TASUN32XCD1103 {0} ok

Re: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:50:28PM -0500, Chuck Brown wrote: Well, I guess I need to RTFM on the Ultra 60 box, eh? I'll try to dig it up from the website today... Output from probe-scsi-all /[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Target 0

RE: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Chuck Brown
Thank you. I perform a probe-scsi and receive the following: {0} ok probe-scsi Target 0 Unit 0Disk FUJITSU MAJ3182M SUN18G 0804 Target 6 Unit 0Removable Read Only device TOSHIBA XM6201TASUN32XCD1103 {0} ok It appears (from what I can understand) that Target 6 is my CD-ROM.

Re: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:03:06PM -0500, Chuck Brown wrote: I am able to read the CD in my Windows2k machine and browse the directories. Alas, I do not have another bootable Solaris CD to try. If you know where I could get an image of one, I'll burn it to disk and give it a try. Give this

RE: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Chuck Brown
Well, I guess I need to RTFM on the Ultra 60 box, eh? I'll try to dig it up from the website today... Output from probe-scsi-all /[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Target 0 Unit 0Disk FUJITSU MAJ3182M SUN18G 0804 Target 6 Unit 0

RE: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Chuck Brown
I am able to read the CD in my Windows2k machine and browse the directories. Alas, I do not have another bootable Solaris CD to try. If you know where I could get an image of one, I'll burn it to disk and give it a try. Thanks! P.S. I'm browsing through the OpenBoot Diagnostics manual right

Ultra 60 Debian Workstation

2003-06-17 Thread Franc Rodríguez
Hello! That such behaves Debian Woody (Sarge or sid) in an Ultra 60 (One CPU 300 Mhz + 512Mb + Creator3D) Someone it can advise me ? That equivalence has in the world Intel ? Thanks. Best Regards. -- Franc Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Departament de Sistemes. MyP S.L. - http://www.myp.ad

Re: Ultra 60 'boot cdrom' Woes...

2003-06-17 Thread Andrew Sharp
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:03:06PM -0500, Chuck Brown wrote: I am able to read the CD in my Windows2k machine and browse the directories. Alas, I do not have another bootable Solaris CD to try. If you know where I could get an image of one, I'll burn it to disk and give it a try. Thanks!

Re: New kernel 2.4.21 and Sparc

2003-06-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Herbert Xu wrote: kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u(from stable) ^^ Make sure you have modutils = 2.4.19. Those kernels are built with a relatively recent version (not in woody) of binutils which requires a new

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 does not work on my SS20

2003-06-17 Thread Erwan MAS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 11:36:41AM -0500, Nicolas Will wrote: | Got the same problem here... | | The machine randonly hangs at the INIT stage during boot. | | INIT seems to be shaky on Woody stable for Sparc, as it really doesn;t like | respawning processes too quickly (I had the problem with

RE: Kernel 2.4.21 does not work on my SS20

2003-06-17 Thread Nicolas Will
-Original Message- From: Erwan MAS I have upgraded my system to debian/testing same problem . I have trie to boot with the kernel argument init=/bin/sh is OK . So , /sbin/init is bogus when using 2.4.21 with smp an hypersparc ? The logical conclusion would be that INIT is