On 18 Jun 2003, Steve Pacenka wrote:
2.4.21:
ehec2,496M,3316,98,13866,27,5968,13,2856,92,12546,13,123.9,1,16,261,97,
^
+,+++,13110,100,270,97,+,+++,1658,96
Some comparative bonnie++ results ...
2.4.21 from Debian, Ultra 10 333 CPU, 512M
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 03:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
On 18 Jun 2003, Steve Pacenka wrote:
2.4.21:
ehec2,496M,3316,98,13866,27,5968,13,2856,92,12546,13,123.9,1,16,261,97,
^
+,+++,13110,100,270,97,+,+++,1658,96
Some comparative bonnie++
On 19 Jun 2003, Steve Pacenka wrote:
Data density difference on a track? From its name, this test would be
writing a block much larger than the on-drive buffer and should be
limited by the rate at which the drive can write to whole tracks on a
platter, and seek between nearby tracks. More
I'm having problems with libc6-dev-sparc64 on testing:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libc6-dev-sparc64:
libc6-dev-sparc64 depends on libc6-sparc64 (= 2.3.1-16); however:
Version of libc6-sparc64 on system is 2.2.5-14.3.
dpkg: error processing libc6-dev-sparc64
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:12:01PM -0400, Chris Beggy wrote:
I'm having problems with libc6-dev-sparc64 on testing:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libc6-dev-sparc64:
libc6-dev-sparc64 depends on libc6-sparc64 (= 2.3.1-16); however:
Version of libc6-sparc64 on system
5 matches
Mail list logo