Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Antonello wrote: On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:40, Ben Collins wrote: /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part4 on /home type ext3 (rw) That's a rather ugly partition map :) Did you read the install docs where it says to not put a filesystem on partition number 3 and leave it as a Wh

Эффективное постельное белье!

2003-10-02 Thread Подарки
Что бы вы не делали на нашем постельном белье, это будет получаться гораздо лучше. Отличный сон, гениальные дети и дьявольский секс... Посетите магазин эффективного белья www.mypresent.ru Для отписки просьба воспользоваться специальной формой на сайте. Спасибо за понимание!

Re: 2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Paul
I am running on a sparc64 (ok, 2 of them), but I also have a sparc 32 (yes, SMP) Personally, I prefer 32 bit, all marketroid blathering to the contrary. If I had a huge database or was simulating weather/gnabgig/etc, then it'd be worthwhile. Otherwise, the overhead of 64 bit just isn't quite worth

Re: 2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:54:07PM -0500, Paul wrote: > Ahh, but my goal is to have sparc32 running. I don't need 64 bt, and I'd > prefer not to have the overhead. I figure that sparc64 is a good place to > start though. Not to mention the SS20 that I'm eventually going to have > running deb. > >

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Antonello
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:40, Ben Collins wrote: > > /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part4 on /home type ext3 (rw) > That's a rather ugly partition map :) > Did you read the install docs where it says to not put a filesystem on > partition number 3 and leave it as a Whole Disk to make OBP h

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Antonello
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:57, Elie De Brauwer wrote: > > ...and a ...umm... I *think* 333MHz Ultra 5, but I could be off by a > > few: > > cpu : TI UltraSparc IIi > > fpu : UltraSparc IIi integrated FPU > > Cpu0Bogo: 719.25 Here is my Ultra10/333. [EMAIL PRO

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Kent West wrote: Andrew Sharp wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote: On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote: Kent West wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+) fpu

Re: 2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Paul
Ahh, but my goal is to have sparc32 running. I don't need 64 bt, and I'd prefer not to have the overhead. I figure that sparc64 is a good place to start though. Not to mention the SS20 that I'm eventually going to have running deb. Any tips on compiling sparc32 cleanly? Thanks - Original Me

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Andrew Sharp wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote: On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote: Kent West wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+) fpu : Ultr

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Andrew Sharp
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote: > > Kent West wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo > > > cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+) > > > fpu : UltraSparc III+ integ

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Martin
> You could install mozilla-snapshot from unstable which provides you with a > CVS > snapshot Build ID 2003061808 which works in a rather limited way (no PSM). > Another alternative is konqueror unless you're a lynx die hard ;-) Bah! Dillo for all your web browsing needs. :-) But then agin - i

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Elie De Brauwer wrote: On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:26, Kent West wrote: But after I dist-upgraded to Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. You could install mozilla-snapshot from unstable which provides you with a CVS snapshot Build ID 2003061808 which works in a rather limited

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Elie De Brauwer
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:26, Kent West wrote: > Kent West wrote: > >But after I dist-upgraded to > >Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. > > Elie De Brauwer wrote: > >Don't even start about it, here mozilla is broken (along with everything > > that depends on it like galeon and firebird) for

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Elie De Brauwer
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote: > Kent West wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo > > cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+) > > fpu : UltraSparc III+ integrated FPU > > promlib : Version 3 Revision 5 > > prom:

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
> I suspected the disk, but hdparm is the only tool I know of for dealing > with that, but I believe that's only for IDE drives, and this box has scsi: SCSI should be good. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> mount > /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1 on / type ext3 > (rw,errors=remount-ro) >

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Amilcar Meneses
I'm goint to try install for compare with you... Amilcar On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Kent West wrote: > Amilcar Meneses wrote: > > >How do you install debian? > > > >Amilcar > > > > > > > We've got a Sun server that runs a tftp server and a dhcp server; so I > configured it to provide a linux rescue/ro

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Patrick Morris
Kent West wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+) fpu : UltraSparc III+ integrated FPU promlib : Version 3 Revision 5 prom: 4.5.16 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 1 ncpus active: 1 Cpu0B

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Kent West wrote: But after I dist-upgraded to Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. Elie De Brauwer wrote: Don't even start about it, here mozilla is broken (along with everything that depends on it like galeon and firebird) for about a month now. The bugreport i submitted is 207743 wit

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Ben Collins wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:10:47AM -0500, Kent West wrote: But after I dist-upgraded to Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. Known problem with mozilla. Try to get the 1.4-2 packages. Maybe they are in testing. Ah, thanks! They don't call it "unstable" for nuth

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Ben Collins wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:42:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote: Kent West wrote: This year, I've gotten the opportunity to put Debian on a Sunblade 1000 (with 1GB RAM - whoo-hoo!). However, now that it's running Debian, it seems awfully sluggish. Another example

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Ben Collins wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:42:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote: Kent West wrote: This year, I've gotten the opportunity to put Debian on a Sunblade 1000 (with 1GB RAM - whoo-hoo!). However, now that it's running Debian, it seems awfully sluggish. Another example

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Elie De Brauwer
Don't even start about it, here mozilla is broken (along with everything that depends on it like galeon and firebird) for about a month now. The bugreport i submitted is 207743 without much succes by now. Maybe the problem is related. Greetings > I've got a Sunblade 1000 with a fresh install

Re: Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:10:47AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > I've got a Sunblade 1000 with a fresh install of Debian. I originally > installed Stable, and Mozilla ran. But after I dist-upgraded to > Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. > > I tried moving my ~/.mozilla directory out of the way;

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:42:59AM -0500, Kent West wrote: > Kent West wrote: > > >This year, I've gotten the opportunity to put Debian on a Sunblade > >1000 (with 1GB RAM - whoo-hoo!). However, now that it's running > >Debian, it seems awfully sluggish. > > Another example: running "glxgears"

Mozilla Fails to start in Unstable

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
I've got a Sunblade 1000 with a fresh install of Debian. I originally installed Stable, and Mozilla ran. But after I dist-upgraded to Unstable, Mozilla now fails to start. I tried moving my ~/.mozilla directory out of the way; I tried purging/reinstalling Mozilla; no difference. When I try s

Re: 2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Magosányi Árpád
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Ben Collins a következőeket írta: > You never said what ver of Debian-sparc you are running. If you are > using gcc-3, I hope you are using atleast 3.3.2. Do we have a list of known to work and known not to work packages? Especially of those which are needed to com

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Kent West wrote: This year, I've gotten the opportunity to put Debian on a Sunblade 1000 (with 1GB RAM - whoo-hoo!). However, now that it's running Debian, it seems awfully sluggish. Another example: running "glxgears" only shows a frame rate of 26 to 44 FPS.

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
Amilcar Meneses wrote: How do you install debian? Amilcar We've got a Sun server that runs a tftp server and a dhcp server; so I configured it to provide a linux rescue/root/boot/install kernel from http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/sparc64/ to the Sunblade 1000's hard

capstan wheel

2003-10-02 Thread Piotr Madrzyk
Hi, Could you let me know if you have capstan wheels for Archive 2150s tape drive. Peter

Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Amilcar Meneses
How do you install debian? Amilcar On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Kent West wrote: > I've typically run Debian on x86 hardware and on Mac G3/G4s, and love > Debian. > > A couple of years ago I started dabbling with Sun machines, specifically > Sunblade 100s running Solaris 8 (having never had any Sun/Sola

Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

2003-10-02 Thread Kent West
I've typically run Debian on x86 hardware and on Mac G3/G4s, and love Debian. A couple of years ago I started dabbling with Sun machines, specifically Sunblade 100s running Solaris 8 (having never had any Sun/Solaris/other unix (other than Linux) experience before). Suffice it to say I was not

Re: [debian-sparc] Update on mplayer support for Linux/SPARC

2003-10-02 Thread Antonello
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:27:48 +0200 (CEST) Erwann Abalea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, without mlib, I can get a pretty good video experience on my 300 MHz > Ultra2, but I have to allow the player to drop frames to get audio/video > sync. When I'm only watching the video and nothing else runs, I

Re: 2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
> I'm using gcc3 (ln -s) and it's stock sparc64 beyond that. The sparc port > seems to have issues with gcc/register clobbers, I haven't dug up the patch > for that. You never said what ver of Debian-sparc you are running. If you are using gcc-3, I hope you are using atleast 3.3.2. > Biggest c

2.6.0-test6

2003-10-02 Thread Paul
Well, I'm new here so a quick personal sparc rundown: SS20 Dual SM62's, Ultra 1 170, Creator3d series 2, 2 qfe's Ultra 10 440   Anyway, I've got 2.6.0-test6 to compile and boot, and I thought I might pass along a couple of wierdnesses I stumbled across (please note that it booted, I haven't

Re: [debian-sparc] Update on mplayer support for Linux/SPARC

2003-10-02 Thread Erwann Abalea
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Antonello wrote: > Where did you find the source deb-src? do you mean the official Debian > archive? Sorry, that was an older version (0.90-rc5). I downloaded the 1.0pre1 version from the MPlayer home page, there's a debian/ directory in the archive, and a 'dpkg-buildpackage'

Re: debian/sparc serial console

2003-10-02 Thread Mauricio
At 18:54 +0200 10/1/03, Antonello wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:22:04 +0100 Emmanuel Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, with my SS10, ROM 2.25, this doesn't happen. I have to explicitely > set serial I/O if I want that. Simply unplugging keyboard (which works > nicely on another SS10 wit

Re: Broken keyboard in XFree86

2003-10-02 Thread Steve Pacenka
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 09:42, Thurmond, Phillip wrote: > I have a newly installed debian (unstable) system. So far, I can’t > get X to work. The mouse and display work fine, however the keyboard > is completely unresponsive. The machine doesn’t even respond to > ctrl-alt-del, stop-a, or ctrl-alt-

Re: [debian-sparc] Update on mplayer support for Linux/SPARC

2003-10-02 Thread Antonello
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:11:29 +0200 (CEST) Erwann Abalea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mplayer-1.0pre1 > > Crashes badly when opening video streams using the X11 driver on 24-bit > I run X in 24 bits, and I use the x11 driver (no other available for me). > The colors were wrong at the first times,

Re: [debian-sparc] Update on mplayer support for Linux/SPARC

2003-10-02 Thread Erwann Abalea
Hi, On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Antonello wrote: > after further investigation, I collected some (I hope) interesting bugs > in mplayer for Sparc under Debian/Unstable. I'm running Debian/Stable, but I compiled Mplayer 1.0pre1 from an Unstable deb-src, and I tested it on a Divx film on my Ultra2 with a

Re: Update on mplayer support for Linux/SPARC

2003-10-02 Thread Matt Fletcher
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:35:55PM +0200, Antonello wrote: > So, it's an mplayer bug. I found no feedback addresses on the mplayer web > site, do someone on the list know how to get in touch with the mplayer team > for a bug report? DOCS/en/bugreports.html in mplayer source... matt