Re: 64bits df

El Mar 18 Nov 2003 01:58, Peter Eisentraut escribió: Ben Collins writes: I would suggest something close to ditching calling ld directly, so that the CC env can make things work smoothly. We need ld to do partial linking: ld -r -o SUBSYS.o foo1.o foo2.o ... We get the right ld to use

Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10

Hi, On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:16:24PM -, Dan Beach wrote: new revised build from http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/sparc-mini.iso (2.4.21 + gcc 3.3.2?) still comes up with Illegal instruction on Sun Blade 100 (haven't had chance to try Ultra 5 yet) but quite a bit

Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm sure you know from the subject what this is about. Yes, everything that can be a module is a module, and only things I need are compiled in. Still I get the above message. I've tried booting: vmlinux gzip vmlinux gzip -9 vmlinux

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

Thomas, Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do all the rest for you. --Adam -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm sure you know from the subject what this is about. Yes, everything that can be a

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do all the rest for you. That's what I meant I tried with the

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:55:31PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do

Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10

So let me understand this correctly. You have an image that works as vmlinux, but doesn't work when you strip it. Is that correct? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote: you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4, not an ultrasparc. Like I said, I tried arch/sparc/boot/image. I tried

SMP hypersparc ss20 kernel recommendations

I had to upgrade from my working 2.2.25 SMP kernel on my dual hypersparc ss20 to a 2.4.x kernel because of the recent debian unstable changes. I am now running 2.4.22 custom compiled single processor kernel. I sorely miss that extra CPU on this box. Note in all cases I'm compiling with 2.95

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:57:27PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote: you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4,

x server no running on a ultra 60

hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid argument Fatal server error: AddScreen/ScreenInit Failed for driver 0

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 20:40, Otto Solares wrote: these are the steps i do to compile a 2.6 kernel on my ss4: ... cp arch/sparc/boot/image /boot/vmlinuz That doesn't work for me. Maybe I'm using too many features. But since I removed all but

Re: x server no running on a ultra 60

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:47:19PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid

Re: SMP hypersparc ss20 kernel recommendations

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:19:31PM -0500, Heitzso wrote: I had to upgrade from my working 2.2.25 SMP kernel on my dual hypersparc ss20 to a 2.4.x kernel because of the recent debian unstable changes. I am now running 2.4.22 custom compiled single processor kernel. I sorely miss that extra

Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:57:27PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote: you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4,

Re: x server no running on a ultra 60

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:47:19PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid

Dual boot between Linux and Solaris yielded spurious interrupt msg

In setting up dual boot on my Sparc Classic between Linux and Solaris, I encountered this message: Boot options: [1] Linux Kernel 2.4.21 [2] Solaris 9.0 SunOS Release 5.9 Version Generic_112233-08 32-bit Copyright 1983-2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license

Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10

Hi, So let me understand this correctly. You have an image that works as vmlinux, but doesn't work when you strip it. Is that correct? Correct. When booting the stripped image, this cause the Illegal instruction problem. Thanks for your help. Olivier -- Olivier Bornet